Page 14 of 15

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 am
by Captain Picard's Hair
And, it was done in the interests of preserving peace, and lives

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:40 am
by Deepcrush
Mikey wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:E-C, no hope of winning but went to battle anyways.
After a heck of a lot of convincing...
And, it was done in the interests of preserving peace, and lives
But they still did it didn't they? They did what they felt to be the right thing to do. Why they did it doesn't change that they did indeed do it.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:41 am
by Deepcrush
Cpl Kendall wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:The USMC practices...
"No retreat and no surrender with Executive Order."
What century is that from? :roll:
This one, glad you understood the tense in that one... :roll:

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:27 am
by Teaos
The E-C didnt know it was going to die. It could have pulled through or hoped for back up.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:30 am
by Captain Picard's Hair
Teaos wrote:The E-C didnt know it was going to die. It could have pulled through or hoped for back up.
Once it was sent back through the rift, they pretty much knew they were doomed.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:35 am
by Teaos
Oh right. I thought we were refering to when they answered the original message.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:20 am
by Deepcrush
When they answered the Distress Call they didn't know the odds going in. Even when they got there and found out they decided to stick around.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:18 pm
by Graham Kennedy
They knew it was 4 to 1 odds before they engaged, so they pretty much knew they were screwed. And they didn't take all that much convincing actually; most of the argument in that episode was between the E-D crew about whether to let them go. Garrett decided to go back the instant Picard explained the situation to her, and her XO announced that he was going unless ordered otherwise as soon as he took command.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:38 pm
by Deepcrush
Thank you!

Starfleet has shown that when they feel something is the right thing to do, they tend to do it. Cost of the matter doesn't seem to matter much to them.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:46 pm
by Graham Kennedy
I admire it actually. These aren't Klingons who want to scream and charge at every chance they get. They're professionals who know that while they may need to die for the cause someday, it's a thing to do only when you have to.

And hey, Starfleet and the Federation has defeated all comers for over 200 years now. Hard to argue with success!

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:57 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Indeed. Despite the apparent pussification of Starfleet in the TNG+ era, the people seem to remember that first and formost they are soldiers, and that there sometimes is a need for them to die for the greater good.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:59 pm
by Captain Picard's Hair
The "engineering qualification" when Troi took the Bridge officer exam was, in fact, a test of whether she could order someone to their death...

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:17 pm
by Deepcrush
Engineering Qualification was a carp shoot. Send a hologram to die, OMFG! Short of having my heart cut out with a spoon covered in salt just to see if it hurt, I don't think ever hate a test more.

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:20 pm
by Captain Picard's Hair
You would need holographic emitters in places like the antimatter injectors and warp plasma conduits, then. Or, the mobile emitter, which only the Doctor has. Robots could work, of course; Trek hasn't always used robots in situations where even we have them. :roll:

Re: Starfleet size

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:08 am
by Teaos
The Federation has an automation phobia ever since the M-5.