Page 13 of 15

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:34 pm
by stitch626
:confused:
Why not call them what they are, Pedestrian crossings? And where I am, we use symbols. Doesn't help, as they are often ignored.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:37 pm
by Tyyr
Same, symbols here. Where I've seen writing its usually done in red for don't and green for do. Most traffic signals are a combination of symbolism and type with both meaning the same thing. In fact most are just symbolic.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:39 pm
by Captain Seafort
stitch626 wrote::confused:
Why not call them what they are, Pedestrian crossings? And where I am, we use symbols. Doesn't help, as they are often ignored.
"Pedestrian crossing" could cover any one of half a dozen different designs - the pelican is a specific type of crossing.
Tyyr wrote:Same, symbols here. Where I've seen writing its usually done in red for don't and green for do. Most traffic signals are a combination of symbolism and type with both meaning the same thing. In fact most are just symbolic.
Fair enough. Most of the ones I've seen from the US have been the written version.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:04 pm
by stitch626
Captain Seafort wrote:"Pedestrian crossing" could cover any one of half a dozen different designs - the pelican is a specific type of crossing.
I guess thats fair.
Captain Seafort wrote:Most of the ones I've seen from the US have been the written version.
Those are usually the older ones. I think we have maybe two in the city we live in. The rest are symbols.

And neither one is followed by practically anyone.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm
by Mikey
See, you guys are all screwy. A "pelican" is a member of a genus of fairly large, fish-eating shorebirds.

And we didn't change things around to be lazy. We changed things around for both common sense, and for the express purpose - as in driving on the right - of distancing ourselves from you guys.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:16 pm
by Reliant121
Traitors to the motherland!

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:27 pm
by Mikey
Reliant121 wrote:Traitors to the motherland!
OK. I can live with that.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:58 pm
by Tyyr
Reliant121 wrote:Traitors to the motherland!
Well I'm mostly German so I have to say your gender's wrong but whatever floats your tea drinking boat.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:04 pm
by Reliant121
To be fair, I'm mostly dutch with a quarter of welsh drifting around the somewhat weak arteries of mine.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:29 pm
by Lt. Staplic
where I live the sines are pretty much 50/50 words and symbols, but their all color coded.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:30 pm
by Reliant121
Helpful for the colourblind, isnt it? :P

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:50 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Great. In the space of three pages we've gone from arguing combat ranges in Star Trek, to discussing dialects, to talking about different road signs.
TR-116 to the rescue!

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:45 pm
by Aaron
Let us not discuss that abortion of a firearm that was designed by a one eyed Quebecois!


:lol:

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:52 pm
by Lt. Staplic
Reliant121 wrote:Helpful for the colourblind, isnt it? :P
well it's either green or white and red so it's not like the colors are even close in shade either.

Re: Trek Space Combat Ranges

Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:25 am
by SomosFuga
Reliant121 wrote:They actually work rather well, traffic often flows faster on roundabouts than traffic lights. Unless its a really really major junction, where traffic lights are a lot easier.
I agree.

Why in United Kingdom they call the pedestrian crossings with animal names?
The zebra i understand it but the others, not that much.