Page 103 of 228

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:51 am
by Tsukiyumi
Very nice, that.

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:36 am
by Deepcrush
She's a little top-light...

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:05 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:She's a little top-light...
Looks just fine to me. :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:31 am
by Deepcrush
That says what again??? :poke:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:01 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:That says what again??? :poke:
Sorry, I don't speak Marylandish. :P

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:19 am
by Deepcrush
Wow, that was lame... even for you... :poke:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:21 am
by Tsukiyumi
That comment was so non sequitur, I figured it couldn't be in English. :P

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:20 am
by Deepcrush
Again... lame... you need some sleep dude. That or you're to busy looking at the pics on the thread.

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:31 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:...you need some sleep dude...
This is true, but I doubt it explains why your comment made no sense. :lol:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:33 am
by Deepcrush
Dude, the horse is dead... :poke:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:35 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:Dude, the horse is dead... :poke:
Your comment made no sense! Please explain your comment!

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:38 am
by Deepcrush
Looks just fine to me. :D
Deepcrush wrote:That says what again??? :poke:
As in it doesn't take much for you to like what you see... Kinda like the jokes on Mark, only he'd be trying to bang them instead of just looking at them... Can't believe you missed that. :P

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:51 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:
Looks just fine to me. :D
Deepcrush wrote:That says what again??? :poke:
As in it doesn't take much for you to like what you see... Kinda like the jokes on Mark, only he'd be trying to bang them instead of just looking at them... Can't believe you missed that. :P
I can't believe that's what that comment meant. Try harder to infer meaning next time, eh?

BTW, my standards are ridiculously high for someone of my financial standing and physical condition. :lol:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:35 am
by Deepcrush
Tsukiyumi wrote:I can't believe that's what that comment meant. Try harder to infer meaning next time, eh?
Dude, it doesn't get any easier... :laughroll:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:09 pm
by thelordharry
GrahamKennedy wrote:At first I think "how could she have gotten so old?"

And then I realise that TNG season 1 was... twenty two years ago.

Jesus. I still remember reading a newspaper article saying they were making a sequel Star Trek series. I thought it was a joke. I watched TNG while I was at university, for god's sake!

I am officially old. How the hell did that happen so fast?
I know what you mean GK. I was probably in secondary school (like Junior High) when I saw TNG for the first time. I think I'm about Wil Wheaton's age so me and Wes grew up together :) Speaking about aging, I was always baffled by the change in appearance of Data between the Encounter at Farpoint and NEM. If I didn't know better, I don't know man, I would say he AGED! Was Soong THAT good that his androids aged commensurate with their present colleague's appearance too? :)

If our Gates is showing her age now, I wonder what Diana Muldaur looks like now (shudders)??? :)

Here's Ian with her in the 60's :)

Image