Page 101 of 390

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:32 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
GrahamKennedy wrote:Woo, we made a hundred pages on this thread!

My celebration is a cute little Charlie Brown remaster
I just love those dances. :D

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:46 am
by Tsukiyumi
This guy totally uses the iPad music features to their potential. Totally rockin. :)

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/ ... &gt1=42010

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:22 am
by Sonic Glitch
GrahamKennedy wrote:Adam Savage and some tesla coils become the most awesome thing I have seen this year.
Thanks to this, I went on a Doctor Who Youtube binge, to make up for being unable to watch the series. I found This to be rather enjoyable.

And this from the 2010 Doctor Who Proms concert (whatever that is ;)) was incredibly epic. Especially with the playing of the Pandorica speech. I am the Doctor

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:09 pm
by IanKennedy
Tsukiyumi wrote:This guy totally uses the iPad music features to their potential. Totally rockin. :)

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/ ... &gt1=42010
That is so cool.

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:23 pm
by Graham Kennedy
The new British aircraft carriers under construction. Awesome stuff, I just wish we would spend more money on defence over here...

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:09 am
by Atekimogus

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:59 pm
by Mikey
Samuel L. Jackson reads a new children's book. NSFW!

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:28 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Mikey wrote:Samuel L. Jackson reads a new children's book. NSFW!
:lol:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:10 pm
by Deepcrush
GrahamKennedy wrote:The new British aircraft carriers under construction. Awesome stuff, I just wish we would spend more money on defence over here...
So on ship with 40 aircraft and a crew of 1600 that's taking 9 years to build while still being smaller then a Nimitz... Whats the point of this thing again?

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:23 pm
by McAvoy
Generally speaking, to have an aircraft carrier near the capabilities of a Nimitz class which they can operate with. That is what I vaguely remember about it.

I also heard that the French might be using the same design as well.

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:39 pm
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:So on ship with 40 aircraft and a crew of 1600 that's taking 9 years to build while still being smaller then a Nimitz... Whats the point of this thing again?
It'll still vastly outclass anything short of a Nimitz/Ford, CdG or Kusneztov, and should be superior to the latter two. Moreover, a Ford costs less than 1% of the annual US defence budget and is still considered a very expensive piece of kit. It would cost more than 10% of the annual UK defence budget.

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:40 pm
by Captain Seafort
McAvoy wrote:Generally speaking, to have an aircraft carrier near the capabilities of a Nimitz class which they can operate with. That is what I vaguely remember about it.
Even better - this time we'll be able to operate with them without breaking them. :)

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:47 pm
by Deepcrush
For the cost of building and up keeping a ship of this size, considering how little it can provide, just doesn't seem like a wise choice.

Wouldn't a bunch of jeep carriers be a better investment for the UK?

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:48 pm
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:For the cost of building and up keeping a ship of this size, considering how little it can provide, just doesn't seem like a wise choice.
Little? Did you read the bit about it being a more capable platform than anything but a Nimitz?

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 10:06 pm
by Deepcrush
Limited range and only a third of the air power of a Nimitz. I just don't see a reason for the UK to build a ship this big that is that under powered.