Page 101 of 216

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:24 pm
by stitch626
For the record guys, from now on, I will not respond to game PMs unless BIG is ccd. Or if its just OOC stuff.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:29 pm
by Nickswitz
Or you can cc him from there on out.... :poke:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:31 pm
by stitch626
But that means more work for me. :mrgreen:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:36 pm
by Deepcrush
I can see hitting the reply button as tough for a romulan.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:48 pm
by stitch626
:laughroll:
I meant adding BIG. Thats a whole 3 extra clicks!!!

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:50 pm
by Deepcrush
Add him to your friends and its only one click.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:52 pm
by stitch626
:doh:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:56 pm
by Deepcrush
:poke:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:09 pm
by Mark
That explains how the Romulans managed to lose territory, the Tal'Shiar, AND cloaking tech all in one generation :lol:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:15 am
by Deepcrush
:laughroll:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:22 am
by BigJKU316
Everyone should have everything, such as it is. Again, in the future please copy me on all this stuff. I honestly spent 3 or 4 hours on just one issue trying to get brought back up to speed. Again, nothing stops you from staging a show to show me what happened, but doing so on Monday around noon does not really cut it either. I can't spend a couple of days asking questions when I need to turn around reports.

Just do it right and things will go much more according to plan.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:57 am
by Reliant121
Ouch, that was more painful than I intended.

There goes my hopes of a SW:III style transition. Suppose its to be expected.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:26 pm
by BigJKU316
Reliant121 wrote:Ouch, that was more painful than I intended.

There goes my hopes of a SW:III style transition. Suppose its to be expected.
Dude they were butchering a whole religion during that process. Plus he smoked out the strong dissenters with a staged war that cost a ton of lives. Such things are bloody.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:27 pm
by Reliant121
true enough.

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:35 pm
by Nickswitz
We must also ask the motives of our ally in this case. We were under the impression that the Breen and Cardassian
Were you trying to say something here, or did your rep have a heart attack on stage?