Page 11 of 29
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:21 am
by Graham Kennedy
Mark wrote:Well, I wouldn't exactly say we're cheating. I'd say we changed the conditions of the test.
When you think about it, if anything we deserve a commendation for original thinking.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:53 am
by Mark
EXACTLY!!!!
Should have known GK would catch the quote
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:03 am
by Sionnach Glic
Technicaly it's not cheating, as they never said we couldn't vote twice.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:06 am
by Teaos
No they just designed the voting system in such a way as to rule out most people voting more than once.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:28 am
by Sionnach Glic
People with one computer you mean. Us priviledged people with more than one computer obviously get the priviledge of voting again. 8)
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:42 am
by Teaos
Actually the number of computers desnt really matter. Its the amount of ISP addresses. So unless your computers run of a different connection it wouldnt matter.
Its just that most of us have a broadband connection that rotates address' everytime it reconnects. I voted 3 times in 5 minutes before I got tired of resetting my internet connection.
If anyone here runs through a proxy they could vote dozens of times an hour.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:09 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Okay, fine, those of us priviledged enough to have more than one ISP adress.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:58 pm
by Lt. Staplic
or multiple facilities in which to access new ISP addresses.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:00 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Exactly.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:46 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Aha! After having to format my hard drive, I was able to vote again! Something good came of it after all!!!
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:11 pm
by Sionnach Glic
See? Every cloud
does have a silver lining.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:08 pm
by Mark
And I found out that my Ultrasurf browser allows me to vote as often as I'd like.
I'm just waiting for Graham to get a complain e-mail about us.
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:43 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Mark wrote:And I found out that my Ultrasurf browser allows me to vote as often as I'd like.
Vote! Vote! Vote! VOTE!
I'm just waiting for Graham to get a complain e-mail about us.
If anybody from over there reads this thread I am gonna be in soooo much trouble.
I suppose I should be a voice of reasonableness in all this, urging honest square dealing. Instead of which I keep telling you all to go cheat as much as you can. I know, I'm a bad, bad man.
But hell, it's a poll on a website, it's not like I'm trying to rig the US elections or anything meaningful here. And for the record, I thought we would maybe score one or two extra votes this way and still lose... I didn't really expect us to
win through cheating. But as far as I am concerned this whole thing has been done in a spirit of fun and good humour, with no malicious intent.
If we get caught maybe I could offer some suitably humerous act of contrition...?
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:51 pm
by Teaos
Oh please Graham. Rigging the US election would be way easier than this...
Re: Water Tractor Production Facility
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:09 am
by Mikey
Teaos wrote:Oh please Graham. Rigging the US election HAS BEEN (cf., 2004) easier than this...
Fixed.