Page 11 of 16

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:39 pm
by Mikey
GrahamKennedy wrote:There was dialogue? I hadn't noticed.
:lol:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:39 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Now I think of it the TOS remastered has whetted my appetite for that as well. Seeing the original done with decent effects shots... just imagine what could be!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:56 pm
by Mark
Cut from the amasing SFX sceen of the Enterprise in orbit to Kirk and crew beaming down to a cheesy planetscape. :mrgreen:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:59 pm
by Mikey
*in toothless old man voice*

Dang kids! In my day, it wasn't 'Trek without a matte glass painting for a background!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:04 pm
by Mark
:lol:

I actually knew one old coot who WOULD have said something like that!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:55 pm
by stitch626
I'll look at it this way, if it requires special effects to be a good movie, then it isn't a good movie.
If the effects are pretty, but the writing is crap, I'll hate it.

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:02 pm
by Mark
Has anybody tried to search online for the script?

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:34 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Mark wrote:Has anybody tried to search online for the script?
I doubt you'd meet with much success. Like I said earlier, Abrams is pretty great at keeping a lid on stuff like that.

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:07 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Mark wrote:Cut from the amasing SFX sceen of the Enterprise in orbit to Kirk and crew beaming down to a cheesy planetscape. :mrgreen:
You know the way CGI is going, 10 or 20 years from now you could probably keep the original actors and replace the entire background of every shot in TOS. New sets. New planets. New EVERYTHING.

I am drooling at the thought...

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:46 pm
by stitch626
That would make me ecstatic. I would love to watch TOS writing with modern fx for the entire ep.

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:35 am
by Mark
Yeah.......that's true. Just imagine if they could set up a CGI bridge set. No more flashie thingies on sheet metal panals.....................oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We'll see a futuristic bridge as it should be!!!!!!!!!!1

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:46 am
by Tsukiyumi
Mark wrote:Yeah.......that's true. Just imagine if they could set up a CGI bridge set. No more flashie thingies on sheet metal panals.....................oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We'll see a futuristic bridge as it should be!!!!!!!!!!1
What, you mean like this:

Image

:D

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:02 am
by Aaron
Ugh, that's terrible. And is Sulu being played by the guy from Harold and Kumar?

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:06 am
by Tsukiyumi
Cpl Kendall wrote:Ugh, that's terrible. And is Sulu being played by the guy from Harold and Kumar?
Yes. Never seen it ( :? ), but that doesn't mean the guy can't act in a serious role. He's super-excited about it; they all are, and I think they'll all act their asses off, especially Zachary Quinto.

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:09 am
by Aaron
Tsukiyumi wrote:
Yes. Never seen it ( :? ), but that doesn't mean the guy can't act in a serious role. He's super-excited about it; they all are, and I think they'll all act their asses off, especially Zachary Quinto.
No it doesn't. It does mean that I cast his acting abilities in doubt though, not many comedy actors make good serious actors. I have no idea who Zachary Quinto is or what he's done before so that's not much help.