www.ditl.org

Faramir's depiction is one of the biggest beefs I have with the film, but there are others too.

Rohan - they were not running away when they went to Helm's Deep. They were advancing to link up with the frontier army, and withdrew to the Deep specifically to force battle on their own terms.

Aragorn - what the hell was that nonsense en route to the Deep?

Elves - there were no elves at the Deep. There was no purpose for having elves at the Deep. The whole point of LOTR was that Middle-Earth was utterly reliant on Men for it's main defence - the elves barely had sufficient forces to defend their enclaves without sending off detachments to help Rohan.

I couldn't have said ANY of that better myself, Seafort. G-d bless you.

Yeah, a lot of the changes to the elven stuff was just gratuitous.

But call me a fangirl, I like elves, so the bits where you see more of them than you would have otherwise didn't bother me as much as they probably should have. Mmmmmmmmmmmelves.

The romantic bits with Arwen and Aragorn were... really kind of overdone though. Bleah.

The romantic bits were more than overdone, they were completely pointless. Arwen played a very small role in the books, and there was no need at all to have her in the films.

Hey, I'm all for gratuitous overuse of Liv Tyler, but there's no need to have her actually speak.

Rochey wrote:The romantic bits were more than overdone, they were completely pointless. Arwen played a very small role in the books, and there was no need at all to have her in the films.

Well, she probably deserved a small role, given that Aragorn's desire to reunite Arnor and Gondor was partially driven by Elrond's decree that only once that had been accomplished would he allow Arwen and Aragorn's marrage. She certainly didn't merit the role she got however, and the gibberish in RotK with her dying as Mordor's power grew detracted from the film.

True, but a small appearance by her, a little dialogue to establish they're in love, Elrond telling Aragorn he can get lost unless he wins the war, and you've acomplished that problem and moved on with the plot.

Exactly. Which reminds me of another small niggle I have with Jackson's trilogy - the fact that Aragorn took a lot of pursuading to accept his destiny as King.

Here's another example of the lack of depth of the films. In the books, Aragorn's destiny - and his acceptance of it - was laid out well before the action of the novels themselves, at the time that he first met Arwen. Now without that depth, the movie has to affect a reason for Aragorn to fulfill his appointed role, and thus ends up drawing out this ridiculous role for Arwen.

The sequals to Back to the Future were pretty good. Unless you consider the whole thing one long movie because of the part II, part III stuff in their names.

I'm with Kostmayer on Godfather Part II, as it is the one of the closest things to cinematic perfection that has ever been made.

I'm surprised no one said Terminator II, yet! Easily surpassed the original. Also, yes, definitely Aliens, the soundtrack by John Williams was amazing, but he actually hated it with a passion. Oh, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III: Turtles in Time.

Chronicles of Riddick. Pitch Black was a cool film but CoR was so over the top it was fantastic.

Yeah, I like Vin Diesel as an action star. CoR was really good, too. My best friend hates him, though. So much so that every time he watches Saving Private Ryan, he'll rewind and replay the scene where Vinni-boy gets shot by a German sniper. What I find interesting, though, is that my friend is big into lifting weights, so he's pretty buff, and he has gone bald, like Patrick Stewart, at only 25 years old, so he's shaved his head. Do you see where I'm going with this?
Oh, and Revenge of the Sith. It was way better than the first 2 prequels, IMO.

mwhittington wrote:Oh, and Revenge of the Sith. It was way better than the first 2 prequels, IMO.

You can put Attack of the Clones into the better prequel category as well. Not that it needed to do much to get there.