Re: Oh my god why.......
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 1:05 pm
So now it's not "Interfering with a crime is illegal in Britain" but rather people don't want to?
Of course, this isn't true either.
Of course, this isn't true either.
Not without a gun you wouldn't. If you where here you wouldn't be allowed a gun.Deepcrush wrote:While I don't expect everyone to be as able with blades as myself. Were I in a lazy mood, I'd be more then happy to just shoot the guy and call it a day.
So then why didn't they do it while it was happening?GrahamKennedy wrote:During the butchering, sure. But whilst everyone was standing around waiting for the cops there was no butchering going on and no reason to kill them.
Simple cowardice, even for them this is a rather pathetic response.Mikey wrote:That only works if there were NO bystanders during the commission of the crime. Otherwise, it's just an SEP excuse for doing nothing.
Because taking on a bloke armed with a knife and clearly mentally unstable is potentially quite dangerous. Most people have a strong instinct for self-preservation, and are therefore reluctant to dive into such situations. There's also the fact that the initial natural human reaction to sudden violence in the absence of an imminent, direct, and identifiable threat is to freeze, and likely be unable to come up with solutions that might seem obvious to people presented with the dry facts after the event. It is therefore abnormal for people to dive into such situations to aid others, which is why those who do frequently receive the GC or GM.Deepcrush wrote:So then why didn't they do it while it was happening?
Where I live, if you see someone trying or in the process of killing someone. Our natural reaction is to kill them before they succeed or before they can hurt anyone else.Captain Seafort wrote:Because taking on a bloke armed with a knife and clearly mentally unstable is potentially quite dangerous. Most people have a strong instinct for self-preservation, and are therefore reluctant to dive into such situations. There's also the fact that the initial natural human reaction to sudden violence in the absence of an imminent, direct, and identifiable threat is to freeze, and likely be unable to come up with solutions that might seem obvious to people presented with the dry facts after the event. It is therefore abnormal for people to dive into such situations to aid others, which is why those who do frequently receive the GC or GM.
Don't know what those are.Captain Seafort wrote:Speaking of which, TR-116 time. Does the US have an equivalent to the GC?
The George Cross. It's the UK's highest award for gallantry open to civilians, or for the armed forces for acts not in the face of the enemy.Deepcrush wrote:Don't know what those are.