USS Phoenix

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:33 pm

McAvoy wrote:Perhaps maybe at best it is the difference between the HMS Victory and the HMS Warrior.

There's probably less of a difference between Warrior and Nimitz than between Victory and Warrior - Warrior was iron hulled and steam powered.

Post by **Graham Kennedy** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:10 pm

Or HMS Victory and HMS Iowa.

Post by **Teaos** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:28 pm

Difference in material is less of a difference than different in power and design principle.

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:33 pm

GrahamKennedy wrote:HMS Iowa.

So when was she commissioned then?

Post by **Teaos** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:49 pm

Alternative history, Red coats won.

Post by **Graham Kennedy** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:50 pm

Captain Seafort wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:HMS Iowa.
So when was she commissioned then?

lol, wishful thinking.

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:18 am

Captain Seafort wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Perhaps maybe at best it is the difference between the HMS Victory and the HMS Warrior.
There's probably less of a difference between Warrior and Nimitz than between Victory and Warrior - Warrior was iron hulled and steam powered.

Uhhh.... what?

The Warrior is basically a sailing ship with an iron hull and steam propulsion. Whereas a Nimitz has absolutely nothing in common with the Victory except they float on water.

And Graham you may not have our toys, you threw away yours.

Post by **Graham Kennedy** » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:23 pm

McAvoy wrote:And Graham you may not have our toys, you threw away yours.

So did you, in the end!

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:09 pm

Still a disgrace to the scrap the CV-6. That ship of should be in New York as a museum.

USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix

Re: USS Phoenix