Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:42 pm
by Teaos
I think that was one of the reasons he said once.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:45 pm
by Mikey
Sounds like a cover story to hide lack of confidence in his ability to command a ship, IMO. What about that whole bit with Thomas Riker, when Will explained that he was willing (no pun intended) to sacrifice even his relationship with Troi to further his career? That seems to have been forgotten when he became comfortable with the idea of playing second fiddle on the Enterprise.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:49 pm
by Teaos
But he did take command several times and did just fine with it.
Maybe he thought he had a chance of one day getting the Enterprise if he stayed their? Or he was just really comfortable and thought he would wait a few years to move on.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:52 pm
by Mikey
He definitely did just fine. However, being able to do something, objectively, and having subjective self-confidence in your ability to do it can be two vastly different things. But I agree - I think he became confortable in his position on the Enterprise, and allowed that to supplant his ambition.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:56 pm
by Teaos
I know I would do what Riker did.
But would you honestly give up the position of second in command of the Flag ship of the Federation with one of the best captains in the fleet and a crew you really get along with for the command of some lesser vessel?
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:21 am
by Enkidu
Teaos wrote:I know I would do what Riker did.
But would you honestly give up the position of second in command of the Flag ship of the Federation with one of the best captains in the fleet and a crew you really get along with for the command of some lesser vessel?
To quote Milton's Satan, and Khan Noonian Singh, Tis better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.
However, I see where you are coming from. If you are happy with your position, in a ship that gets the most interesting missions with a first rate crew, many of them been your friends, it would be hard to leave for the command of a more routine vessel.
It is a difficult job for the script writers. How do you have an ambitious, competent character who doesn't get promoted and therefore leave the series?
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:28 am
by Mikey
Out of universe, it was obviously necessary for Riker to change his tune in order to stay on the show.
In universe... like I said, it depends on what you want. I personally would definitely have left to pursue my own command, because that's how I roll. The problem I had with Riker was not in his decision itself, but that we never saw a specific analysis of when and how he changed his motivation from his ambition to further his career into his desire to remain in his comfortable position.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:39 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
I know that I would have taken my own command, but did you see some of the female crewmembers? How many guys would stay on for that? And I'm pretty sure he had a thing for Troi and used the 'flagship excuse' to stay close to her.
Re: Person of the week: Riker
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:58 am
by kostmayer
Teaos wrote:Him being duplicates is also interesting. I wonder what he feels about his doppelganger. Does he consider him a twin a member of his family or just someone who happens to look like him. It's a real shame they didn't explore this further.
Lets just hope he doesn't phaser him in his sleep like he did his last duplicate. To be fair, none of the characters seem to like being copied. Picard shot his future self, and later stabbed his own clone with a big metal pole, and Data had an unfortunate habit of dissasembling and/or beaming his duplicates into Outer Space.
On a more serious note, I always liked Rikers willingness to disagree openly with his superiors. He argued with Picard on more then one occasion, and wasn't above showing his contempt for the odd admiral. I wonder is his experiences on the Pegasus had anything to do with it.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:30 am
by Teaos
Huh I just noticed Mikey passed me in post count.
It is far better to be second on the flag ship then in some lesser posting.
Its like a modern day sailor passing up second in command of one of Americas aircraft carriers to captain a destroyer. Lot less presitge and power.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:18 am
by RK_Striker_JK_5
He was pretty well-rounded. A jazz musician, a poker player, a great pilot...
And apparently the descendant of one of the greatest strategists in human history.
:p
...
I hope someone gets that...
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:45 pm
by Jim
Teaos wrote:Huh I just noticed Mikey passed me in post count.
It is far better to be second on the flag ship then in some lesser posting.
Its like a modern day sailor passing up second in command of one of Americas aircraft carriers to captain a destroyer. Lot less presitge and power.
But sometimes it is better to have all of the fun, but none of the responsibility.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:16 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Huh I just noticed Mikey passed me in post count.
When the hell did that happen? I guess you've lost your place as the second spamiest member, Teaos.
*hands Mikey the Crown of Spam*
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:04 pm
by Deepcrush
Yes but we still all bow to you Rochey as the king of the meaningless posts.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:26 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Yes but we still all bow to you Rochey as the king of the meaningless posts.
Yup, at a wild guess, I think its safe to say I'm in no threat of being overtaken in postcount.
We now return to your previously scheduled thread...