Page 2 of 32
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:54 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Oh, I agree with you that it is a stupid design.
But it is still infinately cooler than anything from the TNG+ period.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:34 pm
by Ozymandias
I've always disliked the look of the Ori motherships in Stargate.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:40 pm
by Granitehewer
The Ori and their ships and orators/pariahs, whatever they were called were a big let down to me too!
Re: the Constitution, i wasn't a fan because like the 'Balance of Terror' Rommie BoP, the Constitution seemed a little spartan, but i have grown to like its minimalist aircraft carrier aesthetics since watching ENT 'In a Mirror, Darkly'
I love the Hat'aks from SG-1 but think they were overused, eg Lucien Alliance etc
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:53 am
by Mikey
I also dislike the Andromeda Ascendant. Actually, I think it's beautiful, but for a ship of the Guard, it looks about as sturdy as a mayfly.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:22 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Mikey wrote:I also dislike the Andromeda Ascendant. Actually, I think it's beautiful, but for a ship of the Guard, it looks about as sturdy as a mayfly.
To be fair it was a huge ship(over 1300 meters long) with a skeleton crew. It was hadly operating at optimal levels.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:48 am
by Graham Kennedy
Any kitbashed ship.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:03 am
by Tsukiyumi
I'm with Graham on that. Show some freaking originality, for Creations sake. Kitbashing looks like crap. Why not just throw in a bunch of existing classes as wreckage? If you need more burning debris, make it something recognizable. There seem to be about a million Miranda and Excelsior-class ships, right?
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:45 am
by Captain Seafort
Kitbahes thirded. I also didn't like the new Galactica at first - it didn't look as solid as the old one, but I must admit it's grown on me. Particularly with the Adama Manoeuvre.
As for worst ship - I think I've expressed my opinion on the Promtheus almost as often as Rochey's expressed his on the Galaxy.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:14 am
by Teaos
Nebula is Kit bash and I really like it.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:19 am
by Tsukiyumi
I don't know... I don't really consider the Nebula a kitbashed design. More like a variant, using some of the same technology for a different purpose. I would rather command a Nebula than a Galaxy, personally. More manuverability, more flexibility; really, it is a better ship. Who gives a crap if it can't saucer-seperate?
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:33 am
by Captain Seafort
The Nebula isn't so much a kitbash as a Galaxy designed by someone with a brain. The saucer and nacelles may be the same basic design, but there are a lot of differences in the engineering hull plus, of course, the pod pylon. Kitbashes are when you take various randomly scaled Airfix models and glue them together. That God-awful Intrepid/Maquis raider/runabout cross for example.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:16 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
The totally random kitbashes are pretty bad, but I remeber finding a fan site a few years back where he technically created Kitbash ships, but they looked like ligit ships. They were built right, unlike those horrible kitbashes from the series.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:29 pm
by Monroe
The Taidan mothership in Homeworld is pretty ugly. Just a big floating box.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:48 pm
by Mikey
ChakatBlackstar wrote:To be fair it was a huge ship(over 1300 meters long) with a skeleton crew. It was hadly operating at optimal levels.
I understand that - I just mean that it
looks fragile. It's too
pretty to be a ship of the Guard.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:52 pm
by kostmayer
Teaos wrote:Nebula is Kit bash and I really like it.
I like the Nebula too. I'd love to see one fitted with the big big laser that the Future Enterprise D had in 'All Good Things'
Maybe one of you talented design peeps could knock up a sketch or too...