Page 2 of 3
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:47 pm
by Lt. Staplic
I don't think it has to do with the device, but the distace the message must travel through subspace, the longer it goes the more it's degraded, however if it's picked up and refocused along the way it'll be much clearer and get there much faster.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:51 pm
by Mikey
How would degradation (which affects amplitude) affect velocity?
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:54 pm
by Graham Kennedy
One way of explaining the very variable communication delays we've seen over the years is to suggest that subspace signals slow down over time. Hence the relays aren't there to clear up distortion, they're there to ensure fast transmissions. Thus a ship within the area of the network can achieve near zero lag, but once you get outside it the lag ramps up massively.
There's no particular reason why a subspace signal should slow down that I can think of, but it's black magic technology anyway, so there's no real reason it shouldn't do whatever the writers want it to.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:59 pm
by Lt. Staplic
that's what I ment.
the relays speed up the travel somehow.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:20 am
by Lazar
What do you think the Internet would have evolved into by the 24th century?
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:41 am
by Abraxas
With regard to the fusion reactors: have they ever been shown? They seem pretty important (the ships emergency power source), yet they're rarely mentioned, which is weird consdiering how many times the warp core breeches or is about to breech or captains just ditch them...
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:35 am
by Reliant121
They haven't to my knowledge, but that was my understanding.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:18 am
by Sionnach Glic
IIRC, Geordi mentioned them once.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:56 pm
by Lt. Staplic
Lazar wrote:What do you think the Internet would have evolved into by the 24th century?
well, there's this group of people out in the Delta/Beta Quadrants...
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:07 pm
by Lazar
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:46 am
by Mark
Hah.......I was actually thinking about the Binars.
The Borg slipped my mind for a moment.
Re: Questions about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:08 am
by Coalition
Lt. Staplic wrote:well, there's this group of people out in the Delta/Beta Quadrants...
I was thinking this:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Hirogen ... ns_network
Voyager used it to talk to Starfleet (and send the Doctor) in "Message in a Bottle". Apparently regular messages would degrade, but a holographic message wouldn't decay as much, so they sent the Doctor. While doing so, a Hirogen BOfH tried to prevent them, but 7 proved she was a much nastier BOfH.
Later on, they tried to send regular messages back to Starfleet, but the message degraded and got stuck, thus needing them to perform percussive maintenance on a network server.
My question would have been, why didn't they make the messages holographic, and send them that way.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:13 am
by Lazar
The important question is, where are the Hirogen females?
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:39 am
by Lt. Staplic
well, the Hirogen are like Atmun from Egyption mythology...They don't need females.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:51 am
by Sionnach Glic
They reproduce asexualy? They're hermaphrodites?