Page 2 of 3
Re: Federation class
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:08 pm
by Mikey
That must have been the show I saw. Thanks, Tsu. Between that one, "Anatomy of a Supercarrier," "City at Sea," and all the other docu-series on the Military Channel, I don't know one show from the other anymore.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:06 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Abraxas wrote:Thanks for that link!
No prob - it's a great series. Quite informative and entertaining, IMO.
Mikey - I posted links to that a while back on here. Everybody should give it a watch at least once.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:31 am
by Josiah Thompson
I found a picture of the refit Federation class, although it is accompanied by other ships from the afformentioned game Star Trek: Tactical Assault.
Follow the link. The Federation class refit is the one in the middle on the second row.
http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/memor ... dships.jpg
This image I got from Memory Alpha. 8)
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:08 pm
by Graham Kennedy
That's a three nacelled Miranda class isn't it?
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:12 pm
by Mikey
GrahamKennedy wrote:That's a three nacelled Miranda class isn't it?
You're right - that's not a Federation-class.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Aye, not the right ship.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:49 pm
by Reliant121
Lower quality image but here ya go.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:57 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Ew.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:21 pm
by Mikey
That's the one. Rochey's right, though - the narrower, taller profile of the refit nacelle gives it a distinctively unappetizing look.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:24 pm
by Captain Seafort
There's also the issue that that's simply a photoshopped Connie. The Fed-class had a slightly lower profile, sans third nacelle, thanks to a shorter neck and a flatter, wider alignment of the port and starboard nacelle pylons.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:28 pm
by Graham Kennedy
No less than three sets of forward facing torpedoes. Makes it look too "uber" for a real design.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:35 pm
by Captain Seafort
It's the lowermost tubes that give that impression more than anything else - they look taked on, whereas the others are to at least some extent integrated into the design.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:35 pm
by Reliant121
I simply found that from a google image search, werent my creation.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:40 pm
by Mikey
Captain Seafort wrote:There's also the issue that that's simply a photoshopped Connie. The Fed-class had a slightly lower profile, sans third nacelle, thanks to a shorter neck and a flatter, wider alignment of the port and starboard nacelle pylons.
I didn't notice that at my first, casual glance, but you're right - that definitely adds to the vertically-stretched impression.
Re: Federation class
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:21 pm
by KuvahMagh