Page 2 of 3

Re: Federation class

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:08 pm
by Mikey
That must have been the show I saw. Thanks, Tsu. Between that one, "Anatomy of a Supercarrier," "City at Sea," and all the other docu-series on the Military Channel, I don't know one show from the other anymore.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:06 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Abraxas wrote:Thanks for that link!

:angel1:
No prob - it's a great series. Quite informative and entertaining, IMO.

Mikey - I posted links to that a while back on here. Everybody should give it a watch at least once.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:31 am
by Josiah Thompson
I found a picture of the refit Federation class, although it is accompanied by other ships from the afformentioned game Star Trek: Tactical Assault.
Follow the link. The Federation class refit is the one in the middle on the second row.

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/memor ... dships.jpg

This image I got from Memory Alpha. 8)

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:08 pm
by Graham Kennedy
That's a three nacelled Miranda class isn't it?

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:12 pm
by Mikey
GrahamKennedy wrote:That's a three nacelled Miranda class isn't it?
You're right - that's not a Federation-class.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Aye, not the right ship.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:49 pm
by Reliant121
Lower quality image but here ya go.

Image

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:57 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Ew.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:21 pm
by Mikey
That's the one. Rochey's right, though - the narrower, taller profile of the refit nacelle gives it a distinctively unappetizing look.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:24 pm
by Captain Seafort
There's also the issue that that's simply a photoshopped Connie. The Fed-class had a slightly lower profile, sans third nacelle, thanks to a shorter neck and a flatter, wider alignment of the port and starboard nacelle pylons.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:28 pm
by Graham Kennedy
No less than three sets of forward facing torpedoes. Makes it look too "uber" for a real design.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:35 pm
by Captain Seafort
It's the lowermost tubes that give that impression more than anything else - they look taked on, whereas the others are to at least some extent integrated into the design.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:35 pm
by Reliant121
I simply found that from a google image search, werent my creation.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:40 pm
by Mikey
Captain Seafort wrote:There's also the issue that that's simply a photoshopped Connie. The Fed-class had a slightly lower profile, sans third nacelle, thanks to a shorter neck and a flatter, wider alignment of the port and starboard nacelle pylons.
I didn't notice that at my first, casual glance, but you're right - that definitely adds to the vertically-stretched impression.

Re: Federation class

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:21 pm
by KuvahMagh
Well I don't know if anyone else has these, they come from the 'Federation Reference Series" but they were of course authorized by Paramount and while not Cannon I think they shed some light on what a Refit Federation could look like.

Image

Image

Image

Image

It is interesting to note that Graham's problem with the Class, ie the Shuttlebay's placement seems to have been remedied by its removal in favor of Photon Torpedo Launchers.