www.ditl.org

I didn't say I would, just that I might.

Of course dear Tsuki, its your decision.

But i'm sure there is a nameable price

So far, it looks like your option is going to win by a good margin anyways.

You know I could be a prick and edit my first post and swap around Reliants and Tsu's options so Tsu's is winning

Yeah, but now that people can change their votes, people would just swap over. Besides, I like to win by fair methods. I don't even cheat in video games.

I cheat all the time.

Don't play fair, play to win.

Exactly Teaos. besides i cant be arsed with non-cheating. too much effort.

Teaos wrote:I cheat all the time.

Don't play fair, play to win.

I'll cheat, or lie, if it comes to dealing with corporations, or any representative of the government.

Individuals - I always like to win on an even playing field; otherwise, where's that feeling of superiority supposed to come from?

Well, I'm off to take a shower. Think naughty thoughts while I'm gone.

There is that. in games, cheat to your hearts content.

other times, dont.

The feeling of superiority comes from not being caught while cheating.

Teaos wrote:The feeling of superiority comes from not being caught while cheating.

Remind me to never play Monopoly against you.

Option 1 - it's simple, solid, doesn't mix ammunition types, and allows commonality of spare parts for maintenance/repairs.

While I don't like having so few QTs on hand, I do think that coverage is important. I'm going with 4.

Captain Seafort wrote:Option 1 - it's simple, solid, doesn't mix ammunition types, and allows commonality of spare parts for maintenance/repairs.

It also has a total overall ROF of 9.6 per second... Though it does have an opening (one-second) volley equal to option 3.