What would you fix on the E-D?

The Next Generation

What would you change?

Add redundant weapon control systems
0
No votes
Give the holodeck a safe "off switch" located outside the door, to rescue crew in case of malfunction
12
30%
Place components that require maintainance in rooms instead of Jefferies tubes
0
No votes
Install dedicated computers to take over ship functions where possible, as opposed to relying on a single computer
1
3%
Link bridge consoles to a circuit breaker (no more exploding consloes!)
9
23%
Shrink the crew quarters substantially.
1
3%
Add two extra warp nacelles, six poorly scaled phaser cannons, and ten photon torpedo launchers
1
3%
Other (please specify)
5
13%
I would not suggest any changes.
0
No votes
Add diverse and redundant systems to prevent a warp core breach
11
28%
 
Total votes: 40
User avatar
Bryan Moore
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2730
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
Contact:

Post by Bryan Moore »

I voted holodeck, but honestly, the idea of a better warp core, that could be more easily ejected would be far more intelligent.

Also, smaller quarters may not be such a bad idea. Though you could assume what, no more than 100 officers of Lt. (JG) and above, and the rest in shared quarters? On a ship that size, it's reasonable
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
The Wormhole
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by The Wormhole »

What I would fix was already fixed in Generations when they had more computer stations on the bridge. I always thought it looked kind of bare during the series.
Putting the manatee back in humanity.
User avatar
Bryan Moore
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2730
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
Contact:

Post by Bryan Moore »

The Wormhole wrote:What I would fix was already fixed in Generations when they had more computer stations on the bridge. I always thought it looked kind of bare during the series.
Agreed, but the movie lighting was AWFUL. I mean christ. I understand they were going for a military look/feel, as if a submarine. But geezus, even Das Boot it wasn't that dark! But I love the use of the space far more.
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
The Wormhole
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by The Wormhole »

Bryan Moore wrote:
The Wormhole wrote:What I would fix was already fixed in Generations when they had more computer stations on the bridge. I always thought it looked kind of bare during the series.
Agreed, but the movie lighting was AWFUL. I mean christ. I understand they were going for a military look/feel, as if a submarine. But geezus, even Das Boot it wasn't that dark! But I love the use of the space far more.
Indeed, the lighting in Generations was horrible. Especially in Ten Forward, where it seemed as though the only light was coming from outside. Now this is fine when they're orbiting a star like they were at the time. But what about when they're in deep space? Is the room pitch black?
Putting the manatee back in humanity.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

The warp core would be a handy up grade. It is the most dangerous part of the ship probably.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
DBS
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:53 am
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Post by DBS »

Okay, I decided to think about what (if anything) was actually fixed (or at least improved, then compare it to what I'd like to see.

1. Add redundant weapon control systems - not needed, IMO

2. Give the holodeck a safe "off switch" located outside the door, to rescue crew in case of malfunction :lol: :lol: "We're workin' on it!"

3. Place components that require maintainance in rooms instead of Jefferies tubes - I have to assume that stuff is placed where it does the most good, not just based on easy access. It's never really caused a problem, as far as I can tell.

4. Install dedicated computers to take over ship functions where possible, as opposed to relying on a single computer :? - I'll remind the Cylons not to bother our refit! :lol:

5. Link bridge consoles to a circuit breaker (no more exploding consloes!) - What? And remove Dramatic Plot Device?

6. Shrink the crew quarters substantially. - I think there's room. How many people do you want on this ship?

7. Add two extra warp nacelles, six poorly scaled phaser cannons, and ten photon torpedo launchers - :lol: :lol:

8. Other (please specify) - I'd actually keep most of it the same. (except for those holodecks - at least not tie them into a computer that is nearly sentient....) I could see a sort of "soft separation" between the computers. I think it makes sense to be able to tap into the main computer, but you should be able to automatically cut off the connection if there is a problem.

9. I would not suggest any changes. - No engineer would say that...

10. Add diverse and redundant systems to prevent a warp core breach - Finally, something they actually did a LITTLE to improve (at least between Generations and the end of DS9 - Galaxies in the Dominon War took a heck of a lot more damage than they could have without SOME improvement)
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Jean-Luc Picard, quoting judge Aaron Satie
User avatar
Space Ghost
Master chief petty officer
Master chief petty officer
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA

Post by Space Ghost »

I voted holodeck, even though it hadn't quite become overplayed yet in TNG. In VOY, on the other hand...
"Are you considering the strategy I'm considering?"
"The cliché is 'Are you thinking what I'm thinking?' And yes, I am."
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

1. Add redundant weapon control systems - not needed, IMO
I was thinking of the times the E-D lost all weapons to a single hit when I suggested that.
have to assume that stuff is placed where it does the most good, not just based on easy access. It's never really caused a problem, as far as I can tell.
I personally find the idea of high ranking officers (where the hell are all the engineers?) crawling around looking for important systems in the middle of a crisis to be quite ridiculous.
I'll remind the Cylons not to bother our refit!
I don't think I worded that option too well. What I meant was instead of relying on a single computer system, have lots of decentralised computers for different systems that aren't linked together. I didn't mean hand over the ships completely to the computers!
I think there's room. How many people do you want on this ship?
Its a space ship, not a cruise liner! :) The ship could be a lot smaller and would need less resources.
7
Yeah, that wasn't meant seriously! :lol:
I could see a sort of "soft separation" between the computers. I think it makes sense to be able to tap into the main computer, but you should be able to automatically cut off the connection if there is a problem.
Thats what I meant by number 4.
Finally, something they actually did a LITTLE to improve
I guess Starfleets original design team must have met a few "accidents" during the war. :)
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
I Am Spartacus
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada

Post by I Am Spartacus »

I'd shrink the crew quarters to what we'd really see in a military organization, and use the tremendous amounts of extra space to give the Galaxy class redundant weapons control systems, since Worf doesn't seem to understand the meaning of "fire all weapons."
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

I think with something as advanced as a Federation capital ship the main computer may need to be in control of every part of the ship. It does all the work while the crew point it in the right direction.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

So why couldn't they have multiple computers overseeing small sections of the ship?
e.g. One for the helm, one for weapons etc.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Because it is advantageous to have all that controlled by one thing. When the captain says fire at something the ship has to get into position line up and take the shot while not exposing themselves to danger.

We have no idea what the guy at helm is doing. We presume he controls the ship like we do our but maybe he gives a vague comman and the computer does the rest. By being one big computer it can achive results better than many smaller ones.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Teaos wrote:Because it is advantageous to have all that controlled by one thing. When the captain says fire at something the ship has to get into position line up and take the shot while not exposing themselves to danger.

We have no idea what the guy at helm is doing. We presume he controls the ship like we do our but maybe he gives a vague comman and the computer does the rest. By being one big computer it can achive results better than many smaller ones.
The problem is that if that one computer gets infected or damaged, your stuffed. Take the Yamato - they downloaded the Iconian program, and without isolation every system on the ship was probptly infected. If they were going to run athat program at all it should have been on a computer physically separated from the main system. Or the Naked Now, when the disassembly of a single bank of isoliniar chips in engineering completely disabled the ship. It's a recurrant problem with Fed starship design - if the primary system goes down, be it the computer, weapons, warp core ejection, or whatever, there's no backup. Everything's so integrated that when part of it breaks the whole thing's useless.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Ok I'll conceed that there should be a back up system but I think they also need the main computer to control everything. Then they could have back up comuters seperated from the main that do nothing unless the main goes down.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Teaos wrote:Ok I'll conceed that there should be a back up system but I think they also need the main computer to control everything. Then they could have back up comuters seperated from the main that do nothing unless the main goes down.
Why. Why does the holodeck need to know what the weapons are doing? Why do the shields need to know what the shuttle mainainence schedule is? There are some systems that need to be linked - sensors and weapons for example - but most coordination can be done by the crew, and the different computers need not all be tied in to the same system. That way, when the holodecks break for the umpteenth time, cerain holographic megolomaniacs can't sieze control of the entire ship.
Post Reply