Page 10 of 31
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:44 am
by Aaron
Tsukiyumi wrote:IDK, I'd love to have one on my lawn.
Funny enough, I know where to get one...might have to dodge the MP's though.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:51 am
by Capt. Jethro
Tsukiyumi wrote:IDK, I'd love to have one on my lawn.
Geeze man!
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:17 am
by Tsukiyumi
Hey, it would keep solicitors and other people at bay.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:36 pm
by Capt. Jethro
Tsukiyumi wrote:Hey, it would keep solicitors and other people at bay.
No A/A rounds please.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:48 pm
by Mikey
"I'll teach that damned dog to sh*t on my lawn..."
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:17 pm
by Tyyr
Did they ever get a low profile 88 mount?
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:30 pm
by Captain Seafort
There was the Pak 43, but it was never produced in anything like the numbers of the Flak 18 and 36 (about 3500, compared with over 12,000).
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:16 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Surely one of the more famous personal weapons in history would be...
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:33 pm
by Mikey
Indeed, and I'd put the M1911 right there with it. However, I don't know if either one of them could be called "notorious," as in causing fear on sight or having a reputation of instant certain death.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:59 pm
by Deepcrush
Mikey wrote:Indeed, and I'd put the M1911 right there with it. However, I don't know if either one of them could be called "notorious," as in causing fear on sight or having a reputation of instant certain death.
Seems the word notorious is lost to most people here...
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:05 pm
by Graham Kennedy
To be honest, if you're talking about a specific gun that puts real fear into the general population, then I'd argue that there isn't one. Guns are scary things in and of themselves, and it's the "oh crap he's pointing a gun at me I could DIE!" that is scary. The fact that the gun happens to be one particular model over another probably doesn't even enter most people's heads.
Experts of course are better informed about such things, but whilst they may know enough to find certain weapons fearsome, surely that's tempered by the fact that they also know it's limitations, weaknesses, and the kinds of things they should be doing to defend against it and try to counterattack it successfully. I can imagine a division of soldiers being respectful of certain weapons, but I can't imagine them doing anything like "They're armed with AK47s? God, we'd better stay the hell away from these guys then!"
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:07 pm
by Aaron
Mikey wrote:Indeed, and I'd put the M1911 right there with it. However, I don't know if either one of them could be called "notorious," as in causing fear on sight or having a reputation of instant certain death.
The Luger was notorious for jamming, does that count?
I'd nominate the 12 gauge, the manufacturer is irrelevant but who doesn't instantly recognize the sound of one being cocked?
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:08 pm
by Deepcrush
While that my be true, it has nothing to do with the question. The point is that there are weapons out there better known through history by both expert and non-expert alike and has carried its name with both fear and awe.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:15 pm
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:While that my be true, it has nothing to do with the question. The point is that there are weapons out there better known through history by both expert and non-expert alike and has carried its name with both fear and awe.
In which case there are probably only two, maybe three, in this thread that count - the AK and the 88, maybe the buzzsaw depending on who you're talking to. The Peacemaker could be added to that as well if it hasn't already.
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:21 pm
by Deepcrush
You don't see the Tompson in that list?