Page 10 of 41

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:41 pm
by Mikey
Two engineering hulls? Are they completely redundant, or do they act in concert?
Lt. Staplic wrote:can seperate for space station movement
I don't follow you.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:11 pm
by Sionnach Glic
And that's what I mean by "needlessly complicated". Could you not just have one secondary hull, with a magnetic clamp of some kind to hold cargo crates along it?

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:45 pm
by Lt. Staplic
okay let me try one more time.

The ship doesn't have a saucer and drive section like traditonal ships. The Saucer and the two struts leading off the Saucer compise the main parts of the ship. The struts aren't self sustaining, but they don't seperate from the saucer either. Outside the two struts, are the nacells. Between the struts is what i've called the Cargo Hull. It's mostly cargo space and is basicly what gives the ship the majority of the cargo space it needs to be a fraightor. Now the Cargo hull can be seperated from the ship, and in it's place if it's necessary. The ship would be able to haul spacestatons, and move them at warp speeds, rather than havig them move at 1/4 or 1/2 impulse to get wherever they're going.

And yes it is a little complex, but i liked the design.

P.S. If you all think this one's confusing, i can't wait to put up my next one. :happydevil:

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:52 pm
by Mark
:worried:

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:26 pm
by Sionnach Glic
The ship doesn't have a saucer and drive section like traditonal ships. The Saucer and the two struts leading off the Saucer compise the main parts of the ship. The struts aren't self sustaining, but they don't seperate from the saucer either. Outside the two struts, are the nacells. Between the struts is what i've called the Cargo Hull. It's mostly cargo space and is basicly what gives the ship the majority of the cargo space it needs to be a fraightor. Now the Cargo hull can be seperated from the ship, and in it's place if it's necessary. The ship would be able to haul spacestatons, and move them at warp speeds, rather than havig them move at 1/4 or 1/2 impulse to get wherever they're going.
Okay, I see what you're saying now. I still think it needlessly complex, though.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:56 pm
by Lt. Staplic
I'm not argueing that it isn't, I'm just saying that I thought it looked pretty cool.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:22 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Ah, I see.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:09 pm
by Grundig
I'm impressed with your skill at imagining AND drawing these from multiple angles.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:49 pm
by Lt. Staplic
thanks, but it isn't all free hand, i get help with scaling from some grided paper

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:56 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Hey, it's still better than anything I could do.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:36 pm
by bob
protostar-
Image
finally got it :celebrate: (e-mailed myself the pic, right-clicked, clicked copy image url, and boom)

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:40 pm
by Mikey
You e-mailed yourself a picture of a red "x?"

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:44 pm
by bob
Mikey wrote:You e-mailed yourself a picture of a red "x?"
sorry, I can see the image fine

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:49 pm
by Captain Seafort
Red X here.

Re: Ideas for new classes of starships

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:56 pm
by Mark
Red X here as well