I only know a modern perspective too when it comes to seeing movies and television series that were made well before my time. I can still appreciate The Maltese Falcon, Casablanca and Citizen Kane. I can watch How To Steal A Million and still get a chuckle. Ceasar and Cleopatra? The dialogue is outstanding. I can watch episodes of The Outer Limits (the original) and Twilight Zone and enjoy them. All made well before I was born. Godfathers I & II, both released when I was a kid, highly enjoyable classics. War movies? Best ever made were ones like Patton, Apocolypse Now, MASH, all made when I was a kid and unable to see them until years after their release.Reliant121 wrote:Had you even considered that the modern perspective is the only one that someone knows? Katefan, all i know is the modern perspective. I havent been on the planet long enough to appreciate the old perspective. How can i understand something so old it outdates me by almost 3 decades?
Under which Captain would you rather serve?
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
But do you understand the extent. perhaps i am not mature enough to appreciate it. but i simply cant because it is archaic
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
And you largely miss the points of the episode:Reliant121 wrote:And frankly, i dont find that in the slightest bit engaging to watch. one of the episodes that has relatively good write ups is balance of terror, one of the few TOS i can bare. But its basically cat and mouse. thats been replicated...well...for the last god knows how many centuries.
1) Racism. Spock is mistrusted because he apparently resembles the Romulans, who have never been seen before. Racism in the Star Trek universe? Oh my goodness, trouble in paradise!
2) We get a peak into an alien culture. Something hardly ever seen since, we get to see an alien bridge, an alien captain making decisions, conflict from the other perspective. One of the reasons Voyager's Tinker, Tenor, Doctor, Spy was so good was how you saw a peek into how an alien culture works.
3) An actual starship battle. No "reverse the polarity!" crap, we see tactics involved on both sides, the limitations of each side's weapons. So many fights from TNG thru Enterprise culminated in some techno-babblish solution.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
I dont find that entertaining or engaging to watch. that does nothing for plot. that is detail, not plot, IMO.
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
I don't know what your extent is, and maybe you aren't mature enough. But going by your logic you probably have trouble watching the original Star Wars due to it's comparatively primitive special effects. Heck, going by what you are saying you would prefer to watch the new version with it's pretty effects even though Greedo shoots first.Reliant121 wrote:But do you understand the extent. perhaps i am not mature enough to appreciate it. but i simply cant because it is archaic
TOS is far from perfect, there are plenty of crappy episodes. But it was the first 'Trek series to involve time travel, transporter accidents, courtroom drama, god like beings, genetically engineered super soldiers, and other 'Trek staples. Anything you have seen in any other Star Trek series was likely done before in TOS, even TAS.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
Oh come on. Star wars is actually quite good SFX. its not fantastic, no, but it is bearable. TOS, IMO, is not.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
What about B5? The effects on that show are pretty laughable when you look at it now. I play games with better effects than what I saw on B5, yet it's widely considered to be a great show.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
again, still superior to TOS.
and had Characters and plot FAR superior to ANY of Trek.
and had Characters and plot FAR superior to ANY of Trek.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
And therein lies my point: poor SFX can be compensated with by good and original plots and characters.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
But poor characters and plots cannot be compensated for by good FX. The FX for Insurrection and Nemesis were great.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
Exactly, and we all know how they turned out.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
Didn't TOS have an episode where they were attacked by a giant space amoeba?Rochey wrote:And therein lies my point: poor SFX can be compensated with by good and original plots and characters.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
Yes. Your point?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
And attacked by the Greek God Apollo?Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Didn't TOS have an episode where they were attacked by a giant space amoeba?Rochey wrote:And therein lies my point: poor SFX can be compensated with by good and original plots and characters.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?
TOS: "The Immunity Syndrome"
Who attacked whom first is a bit iffy, IMO.
Who attacked whom first is a bit iffy, IMO.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer