Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 11:25 am
That works out fine but then ENT comes and screws things up as usual.
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
Very good point. After all, we've already got hard evidence that the universe hopping Trek time travel involves has a habit of making people apparently pop into existence - Sela.sunnyside wrote:While the situation annoys me. What I think we might be better annoyed with is time travel.
In the origional timeline there were no borg firing at Zephram and all that. So the whole ENT episode wouldn't have happened.
First Contact made a new timeline. For all we know in the new timeline in "Q Who" they have heard of these Borg things, but it just doesn't change time enough that anyone notices when they come back at the end of First Contact.
I mean in all these time travel episodes things have to be a little different when they arrive back in the future. It's just that unless the Federation got wiped out or something they don't bother about it.
Actually that could have been an interesting episode idea. Have a couple minor crew members be different in the new timeline. The people in the origional timeline didn't exist in the universe they find themselves in. Or maybe it doesn't quite work that way.
You mean chaos-theory, each decision causes a branch-line universe to appear sort of theory? I happen to be fond of that one myself, as it seems to explain more issues than most such ideas.Rochey wrote:That's why I like my alternate-universe theory. It can pretty much rationalise all the stupidity we see.
String theory mandates the existance of alternate, branching universes, so yeah. I like that explanation as well.Mikey wrote:You mean chaos-theory, each decision causes a branch-line universe to appear sort of theory? I happen to be fond of that one myself, as it seems to explain more issues than most such ideas.Rochey wrote:That's why I like my alternate-universe theory. It can pretty much rationalise all the stupidity we see.
I didn't realise there was an official name for such a theory, but yeah, that's how I see it. They aren't going back in time at all, merely to a different universe.You mean chaos-theory, each decision causes a branch-line universe to appear sort of theory? I happen to be fond of that one myself, as it seems to explain more issues than most such ideas.
Ahh yes - the grandfather paradox. The most oft-quoted reason why time travel is probably impossible.stitch626 wrote:Worst thing about time travel, what if you kill a blood relaTIVE BEFORE THEY HAVE KIDS?
You wouldn't even need to kill them. What if your great-grandparents met because they accidentally bumped into each other on a crowded street, and you were travelling in time and walked in between them? Oops.stitch626 wrote:Worst thing about time travel, what if you kill a blood relaTIVE BEFORE THEY HAVE KIDS?
OOps, caps lock...
Well paradoxes can't happen therefore they won't happen even if you try to make them happen because that's just how things work.stitch626 wrote:Worst thing about time travel, what if you kill a blood relaTIVE BEFORE THEY HAVE KIDS?
OOps, caps lock...
Why can they not happen?Well paradoxes can't happen therefore they won't happen even if you try to make them happen because that's just how things work.