Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion
Moderator: BigJKU316
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Don't worry Tsu, I'm sure you'll do just fine.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
I'm sure I would.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
I think I still need a Romulan turn.
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Deepcrush wrote:While the basic layout of my ships remains the same. Their overall design has changed greatly over the years. The only reason any of them look like the ones from two hundred years ago is because they were built two hundred years ago.
Of course you're just mad because my ships work.
Klingon ships...........the Toyotas of the 24th century.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Klingon ships are the Ford Trucks of the galaxy. They just seem to be everywhere and no matter how old or ragged they get, they just won't break down.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Yeah working on it now. I'v been rather busy.BigJKU316 wrote:I think I still need a Romulan turn.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
And its in.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
No rush, just making a list for my own purposes mostly to make sure I am not leaving someone out.stitch626 wrote:Yeah working on it now. I'v been rather busy.BigJKU316 wrote:I think I still need a Romulan turn.
I have everything now. Expect stuff back tomorrow evening.
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Well I'm home from vacation, I survived fairly unscathed. Now to the SIM
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Indeed. My early morning thoughts concerning Klingon design: why fix what's not broken?Deepcrush wrote:Klingon ships are the Ford Trucks of the galaxy. They just seem to be everywhere and no matter how old or ragged they get, they just won't break down.
Besides, My vessels in their covenant guise sorta look like giant phalli.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Pretty much. Klingon ships are cheap, long lasting and pretty damn effective warships that can be built in insane numbers with little effort.Reliant121 wrote:Indeed. My early morning thoughts concerning Klingon design: why fix what's not broken?
So thats why you picked them...Reliant121 wrote:Besides, My vessels in their covenant guise sorta look like giant phalli.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Predictable response, therefore I shall claim the moral high ground and face it with a wall of ignorance.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
How high you are and against what wall isn't my concern thank you very much.Reliant121 wrote:Predictable response, therefore I shall claim the moral high ground and face it with a wall of ignorance.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
All turn reports have been sent.
I am likely going to not do news this turn (nothing happened really) and instead do an updated Janes report during the week and likely a trade route map that shows graphically the volume of trade passing through various points.
I could write news on the territorial claims, but am just going to put out a new map sometime tonight. You guys can all decide what that means amongs one another.
I am likely going to not do news this turn (nothing happened really) and instead do an updated Janes report during the week and likely a trade route map that shows graphically the volume of trade passing through various points.
I could write news on the territorial claims, but am just going to put out a new map sometime tonight. You guys can all decide what that means amongs one another.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
A short news report might be warranted IMO. The expansions of so much space would be a bit of a shock way to the populations I'd expect.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu