USS Daystrom Stats
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I was going to have her comm traffic tapped, but very obviously so she would know I was doing it. Now that it's in Rochey's and Monroe's hands, I'll have to use a more direct method. I'm going to try to get it up tomorrow a.m. US EST.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
They wouldn't be monitoring the calls. It would just have control over where calls go and keeps things from leaking off the ship into subspace.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Well, I don't know about Rochey, but both M'Real and the captain would have objections I'm sure. Starfleet does permit privacy on their ships.Monroe wrote:Boush will want to turn off all comm systems except those that happen to the bridge and away from the bridge. That'll make the need for an operator to connect calls but it'd fix that security problem. He's going to recommend that to Rochey on my post. What's Rochey's response going to be so I can post accordingly.Rochey wrote:It also means I can report her for screwing with the comms, without stopping you from confronting her, too.
Wow, one day on the ship, and already she's in trouble.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Yes, but that still invades privacy. What if someone wants to send a discrete message? Or to send or receive a classified message from Star Fleet Intelligence?Monroe wrote:They wouldn't be monitoring the calls. It would just have control over where calls go and keeps things from leaking off the ship into subspace.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Well, I don't know about Rochey, but both M'Real and the captain would have objections I'm sure. Starfleet does permit privacy on their ships.Monroe wrote: Boush will want to turn off all comm systems except those that happen to the bridge and away from the bridge. That'll make the need for an operator to connect calls but it'd fix that security problem. He's going to recommend that to Rochey on my post. What's Rochey's response going to be so I can post accordingly.
There aren't that many telepaths, and most of them don't actively probe the minds of others as part of a cultural taboo. And those that do tend to be discrete. Of coarse there are exceptions that prove the rule.And besides, you could argue against the privacy thing anyway. How many telepaths are free to read other's minds? Star Trek has no privacy that I'm aware of.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Starfleet is a voluntary position. If an invasion of your privacy is shown to be necessary for purposesof security , etc., so be it. If you enlist, are you going to tell your buck sergeant that he's not allowed to go through your fellow boots' gear because you don't want your privacy invaded? That don't fly.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I said "if you enlist" - that is, I was using a contemporary example. And it doesn't matter if the intelligence officer objects - if she didn't want to have her communications subjected to scrutiny, she shouldn't have made covert communiques a/o claimed to have intentionally sabotaged the comm system.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Starfleet doesn't have Sargent. And I think the intelligence officer might object to having her communications monitored.
This is academic - Rochey and Monroe are behaving exactly how their characters SHOULD act, and I'm going to confront you (privately) on the issue of Blackstar hirself rather than the comm thing.[/b]
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I'm done. Why would this need to happen?! This is exasperating.
BTW,
BTW,
You mean like having a clearly organized chain of command and expecting its members to follow that chain? Having to follow orders from superior officers? Don't be dense. Call it military or not, but that's been a hallmark of Starfleet. Consistently finding excuses for not following it simply because you don't like it has made this RPG complete torture in which to participate.Ya, I just hate it when they start treating Starfleet like it's a military.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Why would there be ANY contact with Blackstar at all? It makes no sense. And then just making up a piece of friggin' jewelry that can magically negate anything that was done just because someone else did something you don't care for in their last post? It really sucks the fun out of it. Don't count on my post in the a.m like I had mentioned. Why would I bother? If you don't like what happens, you'll just seem to have found a time-travel device to go back and negate it.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Well, if you're going to have a hissy fit I guess I might as well explain some of it since you can't piece any of it together, but by pm since you're the only one complaining right now. I am hoping to have some sort of suprise effectMikey wrote:Why would there be ANY contact with Blackstar at all? It makes no sense. And then just making up a piece of friggin' jewelry that can magically negate anything that was done just because someone else did something you don't care for in their last post? It really sucks the fun out of it. Don't count on my post in the a.m like I had mentioned. Why would I bother? If you don't like what happens, you'll just seem to have found a time-travel device to go back and negate it.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm