Scimitar vs. Sovereign

The Next Generation
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Teaos »

The difference is Khan was from a culture without space travel and Shizon was. Khan was flying around in a stolen ship and Shizon was in command of one (presumably) designed just for him.
Well to be fair they did have space flight, but I'll grant that it was so primitive to be void.

But even though he didnt have previous experience in space flight the Z axis should be pretty obvious.
Eh, judging from the speculation regarding the Scimitar's abilities, or lack of, I am not certain just how accurate that is. The Scimitar did not seem all that impressive.
I wont debate it again but I pointed out that the Scimitar while not an uber ship is pretty damn impressive, would have been even better under a good commander.
What did we get in Nemesis? It's "The Perfect Cloak" and at no point did we get any indication that the brain trust on the Enterprise E had any idea to counteract it.
In my opinion thats a good thing, I hate it when the enemy has a some new tech that gets countered in a few minutes.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by katefan »

Well to be fair they did have space flight, but I'll grant that it was so primitive to be void.

But even though he didnt have previous experience in space flight the Z axis should be pretty obvious.
And I am certain that if you took command of a USN vessel you would be quite familiar with the intricacies of naval combat?

And besides, if we are talking about how "obvious" the Z axis is why isn't it employed more in Star Trek? Like the battle in Nemesis, for example?
I wont debate it again but I pointed out that the Scimitar while not an uber ship is pretty damn impressive, would have been even better under a good commander.
I fail to see how you pointed out anything of the kind. For a ship that is supposed to have fifty two disruptors it fires the same ones almost every time. Nothing Shizon and his uber ship did was very impressive. Really it was a platform for a doomsday weapon with an advanced cloaking device to allow it to sneak up on a planet to rain death upon it. In combat I did not see anything that wowed me in that battle.
In my opinion thats a good thing, I hate it when the enemy has a some new tech that gets countered in a few minutes.
Point taken. But Geordi, Worf and Riker had more than a few minutes to tackle the problem of the perfect cloak. Cloaking technology is only good if your enemy is unaware of your presence. If they know you are in the neighborhood then it should be a matter for cracking the problem of piercing your stealth technology. Hell, just filling space with chaff and watching the wake would be enough to figure out where the Scimitar is. And that would have made the Enterprise gang look a helluva lot smarter. Worf looked like an idiot throughout; getting drunk at the wedding, abandoning his promotion to go back to the same old schtick on Enterprise, and pretty much not being able to do anything effective against the Scimitar. DS9? Character development? What's that?
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Teaos »

And I am certain that if you took command of a USN vessel you would be quite familiar with the intricacies of naval combat?
And I am certain I am not the most amazing genetically engineered human being ever and a combat genius, Khan almost took over Earth once.
And besides, if we are talking about how "obvious" the Z axis is why isn't it employed more in Star Trek? Like the battle in Nemesis, for example?
Yes it is, ships go flying off up and down and do straiffing runs over the top of other ships, far more impressive than floating up from behind.
I fail to see how you pointed out anything of the kind. For a ship that is supposed to have fifty two disruptors it fires the same ones almost every time. Nothing Shizon and his uber ship did was very impressive. Really it was a platform for a doomsday weapon with an advanced cloaking device to allow it to sneak up on a planet to rain death upon it. In combat I did not see anything that wowed me in that battle.
Well bullet pointing it:

* After a minimum of 8 QT's over a dozen blasts from high power disruptors and several disruptor blasts it still had 70% shields. Nothing has even come close to that sort of damage bar a Borg cube.

* Main weapons took out a Norexan warbird in 4 shots. Took out the E-E's warp in 3.

* Cloak, while it had obvious flaws (Flashed everytime it did something) it did stay cloaked while firing weapons and stopped weapons lock.

* Agility, did some very impressive moves.

* Speed, as fast if not faster than the E-E.

And if you look back at my run down of the battle I pointed out it fired a minimum of about 6 guns and maybe more (Hard to judge the angles in a youtube video).
Point taken. But Geordi, Worf and Riker had more than a few minutes to tackle the problem of the perfect cloak. Cloaking technology is only good if your enemy is unaware of your presence. If they know you are in the neighborhood then it should be a matter for cracking the problem of piercing your stealth technology. Hell, just filling space with chaff and watching the wake would be enough to figure out where the Scimitar is. And that would have made the Enterprise gang look a helluva lot smarter. Worf looked like an idiot throughout; getting drunk at the wedding, abandoning his promotion to go back to the same old schtick on Enterprise, and pretty much not being able to do anything effective against the Scimitar. DS9? Character development? What's that?
Agreed they should have showed them trying to counter it. But I'm glad it wasnt countered.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by katefan »

And I am certain I am not the most amazing genetically engineered human being ever and a combat genius, Khan almost took over Earth once.
In which at no point did he have to command a space vessel in an unfamiliar environment.
Yes it is, ships go flying off up and down and do straiffing runs over the top of other ships, far more impressive than floating up from behind.
They approach one another on the same orientation, on the same plane. There is no mastery of three dimensions there. We had not seen that since ST VI where Chang took the Enterprise A apart.

And STII's ships were portrayed as being large and majestic, but after the Star Wars films with all those fighters whizzing about B&B decided all their ships 1) had to fly incredibly fast no matter how big they were and 2) in the case of DS9 had to be really fragile and blow apart easily.
Well bullet pointing it:

* After a minimum of 8 QT's over a dozen blasts from high power disruptors and several disruptor blasts it still had 70% shields. Nothing has even come close to that sort of damage bar a Borg cube.

* Main weapons took out a Norexan warbird in 4 shots. Took out the E-E's warp in 3.

* Cloak, while it had obvious flaws (Flashed everytime it did something) it did stay cloaked while firing weapons and stopped weapons lock.

* Agility, did some very impressive moves.

* Speed, as fast if not faster than the E-E.

And if you look back at my run down of the battle I pointed out it fired a minimum of about 6 guns and maybe more (Hard to judge the angles in a youtube video).
Six out of fifty two. Not very impressive. I would have been more impressed with a massive broadside of twenty six disruptors or the like.

Agility? Speed? Again, B&B deciding that since Star Wars everything had to move fast, fast, fast! At least in Star Wars, however, the capital ships did not zip around like P-51 Mustangs. I am not impressed with this desire to ape or try and out-do Star Wars.

Yes, cloak prevents weapons lock, but as we saw in ST II a good tactical officer can overcome this. Worf, obviously, is not very good. And if Shizon is a poor tactician, as we saw, Worf should have been able to predict some sort of pattern, similar to what Spock did with Khan in ST II.

Like I said before, I have no idea how good the E-E really is so I cannot say how impressive Shizon's attacks were. At least when I watch ST II we get the impression that Enterprise is a tough ship, able to handle multiple hits and keep on fighting.

By the way, are you going to just completely ignore my other post?
And another thing about the Battle In The Mutara Nebula; Khan has the advantage and Kirk and Spock collaborate to make the playing field equal. We see tactical minds at work discovering a way to deprive a superior foe of his advantage. Then we had Chekov, weapon master, blow the hell out of Reliant without the need for any weapons lock.

What did we get in Nemesis? It's "The Perfect Cloak" and at no point did we get any indication that the brain trust on the Enterprise E had any idea to counteract it. Picard flew the ship directly into an area of space that put Enterprise at a tactical disadvantage, depriving him of his ability to call for reinforcements. Geordi did not look very impressive at engineering a solution, nor did Worf or Riker look very good tactically.

Picard looked like a fool. Yes, so did Kirk when Khan bushwhacked him early in ST II, but he was sorely out of practice and had been riding a desk for some time and honestly had not expected a genetically engineered super soldier to be helming a hijacked starship.
Or would you concede that I am right on all counts?
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Teaos »

In which at no point did he have to command a space vessel in an unfamiliar environment.
The point is that if Khan was such an Uber genius over looking the Z axis is pretty bloody stupid, sure he had never commanded a space ship before but it picked it up pretty damn quick, realising there is an up and down shouldnt be a stretch for him.
They approach one another on the same orientation, on the same plane. There is no mastery of three dimensions there. We had not seen that since ST VI where Chang took the Enterprise A apart.
Again hard to tell exact distances on the video but they seem to be making decent use of the Z axis, they move up and down that about as much as they move along the X and Y when the battle starts. Considering Kirk only drops up and down a few hundred meters it seems about even.
And STII's ships were portrayed as being large and majestic, but after the Star Wars films with all those fighters whizzing about B&B decided all their ships 1) had to fly incredibly fast no matter how big they were and 2) in the case of DS9 had to be really fragile and blow apart easily.
Whats the point of this statement? You dont like the way they do modern battles? Well it happens and there is nothing we can do about it. Personally I like both of them. The only thing that bothered me was that the Scimitar was far to agile for its size.
Six out of fifty two. Not very impressive. I would have been more impressed with a massive broadside of twenty six disruptors or the like.
At least 6, and it used the ones that happened to be in weapons arc, why fire more guns than they need. I proved he was holding back against the E-E so couldnt fire them all against it and he took out the warbirds in 4 shots, when did he have the chance to fire them all?
Agility? Speed? Again, B&B deciding that since Star Wars everything had to move fast, fast, fast! At least in Star Wars, however, the capital ships did not zip around like P-51 Mustangs. I am not impressed with this desire to ape or try and out-do Star Wars.
Nice, you dont counter my point, you just say you dont like that it happened, tuff shit, it was shown to be fast and agile and thus it is. You said it wasnt a great ship, I showed it was. You respond by shrugging your shoulders and saying "Yeah well it shouldnt be"

I do notice you totally ignore my points about the high power of the shields and weapons.
Yes, cloak prevents weapons lock, but as we saw in ST II a good tactical officer can overcome this. Worf, obviously, is not very good. And if Shizon is a poor tactician, as we saw, Worf should have been able to predict some sort of pattern, similar to what Spock did with Khan in ST II.
Worf said he can tell where the weapons fire is coming from but can't lock, this points at the Scimitars cloak being able to activly jam weapons locks. Thus we get them doing what we see, looking at where the ships fire is coming from and firing in that general direction, they get some shots in that way. LaForge said they can't find a way to penitate the cloak so we assume they were trying.
By the way, are you going to just completely ignore my other post?
No sorry I didnt see it.
What did we get in Nemesis? It's "The Perfect Cloak" and at no point did we get any indication that the brain trust on the Enterprise E had any idea to counteract it.
LaForge said they are unable to penitrate it, this would lead one to believe they are trying and failing to break it.

Also this battle is far more fast pased than the one in TWOK. there is no long (comparitivly) streches with no wepaons fire, there is no time to sit down over a cup of tea to talk about battle strategies. They get ambushed (granted by Picard being an idiot) and then jump right into a fast pased battle.
Geordi did not look very impressive at engineering a solution, nor did Worf or Riker look very good tactically
Geordi was holding the ship together after the core got knocked to hell. Riker ran off to fight a boarding party and Worf did infact nail the Scimitar with a good number of hits considering he couldnt get a real lock.
Picard looked like a fool. Yes, so did Kirk when Khan bushwhacked him early in ST II, but he was sorely out of practice and had been riding a desk for some time and honestly had not expected a genetically engineered super soldier to be helming a hijacked starship.
Agreed, Picard was a knob for going into that nebula.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by katefan »

The point is that if Khan was such an Uber genius over looking the Z axis is pretty bloody stupid, sure he had never commanded a space ship before but it picked it up pretty damn quick, realising there is an up and down shouldnt be a stretch for him.
I get your point, and I refute it. Khan's intelligence is not perfect and it can be easily clouded by emotion. If you recall the battle began with Kirk goading him into entering the nebula. After a nasty exchange, Khan loses his chief advisor/son, and now he's pretty damned pissed off. I would say he is not thinking very clearly there.

Intelligence does not equal wisdom. The wise man would have stayed the hell out of the nebula.
Again hard to tell exact distances on the video but they seem to be making decent use of the Z axis, they move up and down that about as much as they move along the X and Y when the battle starts. Considering Kirk only drops up and down a few hundred meters it seems about even.
If you cannot verify then I guess we will have to drop that element of the argument.
Whats the point of this statement? You dont like the way they do modern battles? Well it happens and there is nothing we can do about it. Personally I like both of them. The only thing that bothered me was that the Scimitar was far to agile for its size.
The point is in ST II the ships move slowly, and later on they zip around and like you pointed out, are far too agile for their size. Sure there is nothing we can do about it, which makes me wonder why you made such an obvious statement. Doesn't mean I can't bitch about Star Trek losing an element of it's originality in order to cater to an ADD audience who need speed and pretty 'sposions every thirty seconds.
At least 6, and it used the ones that happened to be in weapons arc, why fire more guns than they need.
To overwhelm the enemy in as short a time as possible.
I proved he was holding back against the E-E so couldnt fire them all against it and he took out the warbirds in 4 shots, when did he have the chance to fire them all?
Perhaps you are right in regards to the lack of opportunity to open up with it's entire arsenal. I just don't see the point in saying the ship has fifty two disruptors, which seems like a ridiculous number to me.

But I concede your point.
Nice, you dont counter my point, you just say you dont like that it happened, tuff s**t, it was shown to be fast and agile and thus it is. You said it wasnt a great ship, I showed it was. You respond by shrugging your shoulders and saying "Yeah well it shouldnt be"
You have a point there. I will say, however, that the only reason it was moving faster than the E-E is the E-E was probably afraid of running into a cloaked ship, while Shizon did not have that fear.
I do notice you totally ignore my points about the high power of the shields and weapons.
Honestly, I forgot to. The shields don't have to be all that powerful, seeing as it did not take nearly as many hits as the Enterprise did. But I will give you the point concerning the weapons.
Worf said he can tell where the weapons fire is coming from but can't lock, this points at the Scimitars cloak being able to activly jam weapons locks. Thus we get them doing what we see, looking at where the ships fire is coming from and firing in that general direction, they get some shots in that way. LaForge said they can't find a way to penitate the cloak so we assume they were trying.
But the point I made is a good tactical officer doesn't let a lack of lock stop him. Like I said, Chekov did not need a lock to kick ass. Worf (again) is made to look weak an ineffective, which is nothing new outside of DS9. If he is not getting drunk at parties he is getting Klingon zits.
LaForge said they are unable to penitrate it, this would lead one to believe they are trying and failing to break it.
Which makes LaForge a comparitively wussy engineer compared to the likes of Scotty and O'Brien. And you do not ever have to break the cloak, just come up with a way around it. I came up with an idea concerning space chaff (something similar employed in Balance of Terror with a comet's tail). There was also the anti-cloak pulse seen in Voyager. TNG's cast is made to look like idiots. Which I guess was necessary so Shizon did not look even worse.
Also this battle is far more fast pased than the one in TWOK. there is no long (comparitivly) streches with no wepaons fire, there is no time to sit down over a cup of tea to talk about battle strategies. They get ambushed (granted by Picard being an idiot) and then jump right into a fast pased battle.
Geordi and Worf had plenty of time before the battle to address the perfect cloak issue while Enterprise hung over Romulus and Picard spoke with Shizon. What does Worf do in his spare time while deep in Romulan territory with that massive ship just kilometers off the bow?
Geordi was holding the ship together after the core got knocked to hell. Riker ran off to fight a boarding party and Worf did infact nail the Scimitar with a good number of hits considering he couldnt get a real lock.
Again, I am addressing what Geordi did not do before the battle, and that is come up with alternatives to defeating the cloak.

And Riker fighting the boarding party was a joke. Hmmm, they are creatures sensitive to light, I guess he decided to be polite and keep the lights low for them during the skirmish.

But Riker had no ideas either regarding the cloak either before or during the battle.

And Worf should have gotten more hits, IMO. He is supposed to be a veteran tactical officer, fought many engagements during the Dominion war, should have come up with tactical solutions. I expect more of a character that was made to look like such a badass during DS9.
Agreed, Picard was a knob for going into that nebula.
Glad we agree on something.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Mikey »

I would just reiterate Spock's point about Khan when engaged with him in the Mutara Nebula - intelligence =/= experience. This begs the question, of course, why Kirk - with his vast amount of combat experience - had to be reminded, but...
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Teaos »

I get your point, and I refute it. Khan's intelligence is not perfect and it can be easily clouded by emotion. If you recall the battle began with Kirk goading him into entering the nebula. After a nasty exchange, Khan loses his chief advisor/son, and now he's pretty damned pissed off. I would say he is not thinking very clearly there.

Intelligence does not equal wisdom. The wise man would have stayed the hell out of the nebula.
True but I still stand by the fact that the Z axis is pretty fucking obvious, no matter the circumstances it was idiotic of him to ignore him.
If you cannot verify then I guess we will have to drop that element of the argument
:roll:

I said I can't see the exact heights, not that I couldnt see it, they obviously use the Z axis as much or almost as much as the X and Y.
The point is in ST II the ships move slowly, and later on they zip around and like you pointed out, are far too agile for their size. Sure there is nothing we can do about it, which makes me wonder why you made such an obvious statement. Doesn't mean I can't bitch about Star Trek losing an element of it's originality in order to cater to an ADD audience who need speed and pretty 'sposions every thirty seconds.
Well the difference between TOS and TNG is over 100 years, a pretty clear reason why ships may be more agile.

My issue was you were saying you dont like it thus we should disregard it.
To overwhelm the enemy in as short a time as possible.
Again i say, 4 shots to take out the Warbirds, he did overwhelm them.
I will say, however, that the only reason it was moving faster than the E-E is the E-E was probably afraid of running into a cloaked ship, while Shizon did not have that fear.
The E-E was running towards their fleet (through the Nebula :roll: ), I would imagin they were trying to get there as fast as possible.
But the point I made is a good tactical officer doesn't let a lack of lock stop him. Like I said, Chekov did not need a lock to kick ass. Worf (again) is made to look weak an ineffective, which is nothing new outside of DS9. If he is not getting drunk at parties he is getting Klingon zits.
I agree that we didnt see Worf doing the cool stuff Chekov did but as I pointed out he did score quite a few shots against a ship that was supposed to be under a perfect cloak, he was doing something right.
Which makes LaForge a comparitively wussy engineer compared to the likes of Scotty and O'Brien. And you do not ever have to break the cloak, just come up with a way around it. I came up with an idea concerning space chaff (something similar employed in Balance of Terror with a comet's tail). There was also the anti-cloak pulse seen in Voyager. TNG's cast is made to look like idiots. Which I guess was necessary so Shizon did not look even worse.
Ok they can fire a chaff torpedo or jerry rig some other chaff like thing.

*You have just been ambushed and are now in the middle of a fire fight, Make me a chaff thingy... go go go!*

They really did not have that much time even before the battle begun. They said it was a whole new level of cloak, I doubt it will be undone by flooding the area with a chalk cloud. Infact they were in a Nebula full of... stuff. You chaff idea works by them seeing movement in the chaff, since they couldnt see movement in the Nebula dust I imagin the cloak counters that.


Over all I agree that the Character in TWOK had more... coolness to them, them seemed to be the deciding factor in the battle were as in Nemesis the ships were the stars.

I guess it just comes down to personal preference, I like the all out fire fight seen in Nemesis. I also like the more graceful battle seen in TWOK.

I dont think either one is bad, they are totally different fights and each has its good and bad bits.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Reliant121 »

For me they can't be compared. They are different styles of battle.

TWOK kinda makes me think of two swan's having a duel. Graceful, yet vicious jabs here or there, each one powerful, but its still perfected and synchronized.

Nemesis on the other hand is an all out bar-fight. Enterprise fires relentlessly everything she's got, letting loose a torrent of fire. True, Scimitar doesnt return that fire, but its all alot more intense and desperate than in TWOK.


I like them both equally, for different reasons.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Agreed, except for the part about liking them both. The Battle of the Mutara Nebula was an intense and vicious fight between two mortal enemies. The Battle of the Unamed Green Cloud Thing made no fucking sense at all.

But I agree that battles were massively different in TOS and TNG.
In TWOK, the battle was like that of two WW2 era battleships. Both sides trading blows before withdrawing momentarily to judge the situation before going back on the attack. Slow, graceful, and utterly lethal.
In NEM, the battle was like that of a group of WW2 era aircraft. Both sides swooping and banking around each other as they unleashed fire down upon each other.

Personaly, I like the TWOK battle better.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Reliant121 »

Nitpick: NEM battle was named, it would be the battle of the Bassen Rift.
User avatar
KuvahMagh
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:30 am
Location: Canada

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by KuvahMagh »

I liked both battles but I prefer TWOK, I just think it was better put together from a creative standpoint. The Nemesis battle had flaws that have been pointed out many times before but I still like it in that we actually get to see the Big E try and kick ass. Even when the Borg were around we had to listen to the Radio... boy that was exciting...
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel

Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by Mark »

IDK, I'm just shallow. I LOVE BATTLE SCEENS.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by stitch626 »

abandoning his promotion to go back to the same old schtick on Enterprise
This is in reference to Worf.

I have one question, wasn't Worf on the Enterprise in order to go to the wedding serimony on Batazed?
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
KuvahMagh
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:30 am
Location: Canada

Re: Scimitar vs. Soverign

Post by KuvahMagh »

stitch626 wrote:
abandoning his promotion to go back to the same old schtick on Enterprise
This is in reference to Worf.

I have one question, wasn't Worf on the Enterprise in order to go to the wedding serimony on Batazed?
If that were the case I would expect him to be dressed as a Klingon Diplomat, instead throughout he wears his uniform. That and the fact that they never mention he is replacing the normal guy at Tactical and the fact that he assumes that post before the crisis is really known about. If he were a diplomat you would expect him to sit back for a while and only step in once they realised they needed him at Tactical...
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel

Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
Post Reply