Star Trek XI

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs

Do you think that it's a good idea for Trek XI to be set in TOS era?

Yes, it's a good a time as any.
6
11%
No, it should have been set in some other period.
14
26%
I'll watch it before I pass judgement.
30
57%
They should stop making Star Trek for a while.
3
6%
 
Total votes: 53
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Deepcrush wrote:My father told me that a cruise company wants to build a Titanic-II. That worries even me.
A lot of company's have wanted to build a Titanic II, but they rarely get past the planning stage. Not to mention a lot of sailors are superstitious to some extent, and given the Titanic's history many would be against crewing such a ship.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Captain Seafort »

Eh, that's happened before. Back in the mid 18th century, the Admiralty wanted to give a new warship a particular name, and faced an outcry among the lower decks (and a good few of the Admiralty) because the previous ship of that name had sunk with all hands after hitting rocks. In the end the complaints were ignored, the original name was kept, and the ship did alright, "unlucky" name or not.

The name in question was HMS Victory.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Captain Seafort wrote:Eh, that's happened before. Back in the mid 18th century, the Admiralty wanted to give a new warship a particular name, and faced an outcry among the lower decks (and a good few of the Admiralty) because the previous ship of that name had sunk with all hands after hitting rocks. In the end the complaints were ignored, the original name was kept, and the ship did alright, "unlucky" name or not.

The name in question was HMS Victory.
The difference is that Titanic is a civie cruise ship, and the project is more likely to listen to popular opinion.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Captain Seafort »

Blackstar the Chakat wrote:The difference is that Titanic is a civie cruise ship, and the project is more likely to listen to popular opinion.
The other angle is that of people who'd want to sail on the ship specifically because it was called Titanic. Slightly maudlin, and a touch distasteful to take advantage of the tragedy to sell tickets, but there are people who pay for it and companies that would sell.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mark »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:The difference is that Titanic is a civie cruise ship, and the project is more likely to listen to popular opinion.
The other angle is that of people who'd want to sail on the ship specifically because it was called Titanic. Slightly maudlin, and a touch distasteful to take advantage of the tragedy to sell tickets, but there are people who pay for it and companies that would sell.
For some reason, I find that so disturbing on many different levels. :?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Are they talking about a full interior replica? 'Cause I'd take a cruise on that, no problem.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Sionnach Glic »

If I may drag this back to the original topic, anyone know when ST:11 is coming out?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Tsukiyumi »

May 8, 2009 is the current release date.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mikey »

Rochey wrote:If I may drag this back to the original topic,
Are you kidding?!
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I know, I know, I beg forgiveness, but does anyone actualy know when it's coming out?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Tsukiyumi »

What, is my post invisible? :?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Uh....yes? :P

Sorry, didn't see it there.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Tsukiyumi »

I tell you, I get no regard... No regard at all. No esteem either. :lol:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mark »

Tsukiyumi wrote:May 8, 2009 is the current release date.
In theory. Unless they find a reason to push it back again.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Tsukiyumi »

The main reason they've moved it so much was the writer's strike, and now they're trying to avoid competition. On the plus side, JJ Abrams has stated that it gives them more time to "perfect the special effects". I assume it'll look amazing at least.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Post Reply