www.ditl.org

Say what you will about the showm but the intrepid is not a bad ship. Much better looking than the Defiant and the GCS.

Actually I find it one of the uglier in Trek history. Both the GCS and the Defiant look better to me. Those tiny nacelles look ridiculous on the Intrepid. It's just plain unbalanced looking.

How a ship 'looks' or if it's ugly or beautiful is in the eye of the beholder. I love the Galaxy and Defiant. And the Inrepid. Heck, I don't think of any Starfleet ship as 'ugly'.

Striker, have you seen the Yeager, that is undeniably ugly, it is, it's a mix of the Maquis ship, and the intrepid.

Nickswitz wrote:Striker, have you seen the Yeager, that is undeniably ugly, it is, it's a mix of the Maquis ship, and the intrepid.

Actually, No. I have not seen this Yeager.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Nickswitz wrote:Striker, have you seen the Yeager, that is undeniably ugly, it is, it's a mix of the Maquis ship, and the intrepid.

Actually, No. I have not seen this Yeager.

Of course not. It doesn't exist.

You just keep telling yourself that.

Here, let me show you the atrocity



Please don't tell me you think that looks good, and it's canon too.

All right, I'll admit that's not a good looking class.

Ahoy! Abortion to starboard!

Where's the deflector?

What an awful design.

Looks like the back half is made of lego...

Teaos wrote:Looks like the whole thing is made of suck...

Fixed for ya.

Mikey wrote:

GrahamKennedy wrote:Heh, I was just watching that last night!

Ah, the good old days, when Steve Martin was funny.

Captain Navin R. Johnson of the USS Optigrab?

Going back to the "America-centric" thoughts, TOS brought us "U.S.S." I know it probably stands for United Space Ship or United Star Ship (canon?) but it undoubtedly comes from United States Ship...

Would H.M.S. stand for Highly Manuverable Ship in Trek?

Would H.M.S. stand for Highly Manuverable Ship in Trek?

So the Defiant should be an HMS instead of a USS...