USS Daystrom Beta Prep
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I appreciate the comments. I went with eleven troops because I was figuring 3 fire/spec. weapons teams of 3 + 1 officer and 1 non-com (to use modern-day platoon terms.) I didn't intend for it to actually be a main troop carrier, just add some flexibility or the ability to use for a special operation. I also figured on a using a lot of room per person, because I was thinking of real soldiers in full kit with longarms, etc., plus a squad weapon per team - an isomagnetic disintegrator or some such. I know Munro's boys - esp. spec ops - wouldn't go into battle as unprepared as normal SF troops.
Also, I had figured on upper and lower crawlspaces of about 1 - 1.5 m, plus the mechanisms for the fore and aft entry/egress ramps.
Also, I had figured on upper and lower crawlspaces of about 1 - 1.5 m, plus the mechanisms for the fore and aft entry/egress ramps.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Even fully kitted out 4m^2 seems plenty to me. That's a king size bed - the person would probably take up a quarter of that standing up/sitting down, and then the rest would be plenty of room for their personal equipment. Obviously it's not a troop carrier, but I figure it could be very useful - not necessarily in this mission - to carry large amounts of people whereby the transporters are offline/unusable.
For example, the Chinook Helicoper carries about 50 people - and just the lower deck of this shuttle is considerably bigger, even taking into account the large amount of room required for machinery.
For example, the Chinook Helicoper carries about 50 people - and just the lower deck of this shuttle is considerably bigger, even taking into account the large amount of room required for machinery.
80085
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Probably, again, that looks only about 2x3 metres. Maybe takes up the space of 2 men. You've got to remember this 'shuttle' is huge - more like a little starship.ChakatBlackstar wrote:What about secondary vehicles like an Argo jeep? Could that fit down there?
An Argo jeep needs a lot of work, though. I'd start off by suggesting forcefields acting as a shield - covering the stupidly large gaps between the rollbars.
Indeed, maybe we could have a few of these jeeps, and maybe a sort of ('modernised') tank.
80085
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Sure. Evac or emergency capability would obviously be more than 11, plus there's the fore cargo bay. And Thorin's right about modding the Argo, but I would start here - take the friggin' wheels off! Isn't this the 24th century?ChakatBlackstar wrote:What about secondary vehicles like an Argo jeep? Could that fit down there?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
And if the anti-grav gets hit by a phaser shot you could be easily stranded with out the right part. Even without a wheel you might still be able to drag the jeep back home. (not a road legal idea but we won't be on a road) Complex isn't always better.Mikey wrote:Sure. Evac or emergency capability would obviously be more than 11, plus there's the fore cargo bay. And Thorin's right about modding the Argo, but I would start here - take the friggin' wheels off! Isn't this the 24th century?ChakatBlackstar wrote:What about secondary vehicles like an Argo jeep? Could that fit down there?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
If you're without a wheel, you're in just as bad shape as with a non-function antigrav. The antigrav would also certainly be better able to negotiate more varied terrain. However, if someone wants to design one, bang one out.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
What's wrong with wheels? It's something that doesn't go wrong. Anti-grav 'skis' can go wrong, while quite primitive I don't see what's wrong with wheels. And anti-grav skis would be too Star Wars Speed Racer for me! Obviously the wheels would be run on flat.
Maybe we could bring an Argo style jeep into the story by someone having read about it in the Enterprise's log or something, and suggesting it might be a good idea to have some onboard - hell - even some onboard the Daystrom itself would be a good idea. It'd be cool to beam down people while they're actually inside the vehicle.
So I'd suggest a forcefield-shield so there's no way normal bullets/shrapnel could get through. Also make it a 4 seater - 2 in the front and 2 slightly raised ones in the back. Make it so the 2 back seats can swivel 360 degrees and each seat has one of them cannons (though more powerful than we see in Nemesis - modern day grenade launchers do more than that...). One of the front ones can be the driver, the other can have the control pannels/sensors/'remote control'
Maybe we could bring an Argo style jeep into the story by someone having read about it in the Enterprise's log or something, and suggesting it might be a good idea to have some onboard - hell - even some onboard the Daystrom itself would be a good idea. It'd be cool to beam down people while they're actually inside the vehicle.
So I'd suggest a forcefield-shield so there's no way normal bullets/shrapnel could get through. Also make it a 4 seater - 2 in the front and 2 slightly raised ones in the back. Make it so the 2 back seats can swivel 360 degrees and each seat has one of them cannons (though more powerful than we see in Nemesis - modern day grenade launchers do more than that...). One of the front ones can be the driver, the other can have the control pannels/sensors/'remote control'
Last edited by Thorin on Fri May 16, 2008 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
80085
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
but a flat tire is easier to fix then an antigrav. Even in modern times we have stop gap measures to fix a tire...temperarily at least. And we're talking a few hundred years in the future, I'm sure they've come up with something a lot better by then.Mikey wrote:If you're without a wheel, you're in just as bad shape as with a non-function antigrav.
Hmmm...maybe an anti-grav stabalizer for jumps, or short boosts over tough terrain.
How about this, using the calculator. Yeah, it's not overly serious as to be particularly important, but fun to compare it to a shuttle/starship
Length : 3.8 m
Beam : 2.1 m
Height : 2.0 m
Decks : 1
Mass : 0.75 tons
Crew : 4
2 x micro phase cannons, total output 0.4 TW
Handheld personnel weapons
Level 8 forcefield system, total capacity 5.1 TJ
Light Duranium/Tritanium Single hull plus 0.1 cm high density armour
No structural integrity field
Max acceleration: 20 m/s/s
Max speed: 200 m/s
Beam Firepower : 0.008
Torpedo Firepower : 0
Weapon Range and Accuracy : 2
Shield Strength : 0.002
Hull Armour : 11.563
Speed : 0.0000001
Combat Manoeuvrability : -
Over all: 0.997
Length : 3.8 m
Beam : 2.1 m
Height : 2.0 m
Decks : 1
Mass : 0.75 tons
Crew : 4
2 x micro phase cannons, total output 0.4 TW
Handheld personnel weapons
Level 8 forcefield system, total capacity 5.1 TJ
Light Duranium/Tritanium Single hull plus 0.1 cm high density armour
No structural integrity field
Max acceleration: 20 m/s/s
Max speed: 200 m/s
Beam Firepower : 0.008
Torpedo Firepower : 0
Weapon Range and Accuracy : 2
Shield Strength : 0.002
Hull Armour : 11.563
Speed : 0.0000001
Combat Manoeuvrability : -
Over all: 0.997
80085