We've never seen that, though. We HAVE seen inertial dampers failing to respond to an unplanned event (like getting fired upon) but never a reaction from them in the other direction.Johnny Starfleet wrote:Could that mean that they might even make things worse? If two ships collide, you get a massive change in inertia, throwing everyone about the ship. Then the ID kicks in, maybe mid flight for a crewman, and arrests their momentum to a dead stop very quickly. Maybe they should turn that bad boy off and use seatbelts in combat instead.
Graham's Frankestien Fleet
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Well, when the E-D's saucer collided with the ground everyone on the ship got thrown forward.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Grey area, I guess. Hitting the ground certainly wasn't an input helm maneuver, although one could certainly say that the impact was expected and could therefore have been relayed to the dampers through the helm. The reaction to the impact could be attributed to any or all of a) nobody did actually alert the dampers; b) they were offline or diminished in capacity; or b) that sort of sudden stop was too much for the dampers to completely mitigate.Rochey wrote:Well, when the E-D's saucer collided with the ground everyone on the ship got thrown forward.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I'd count it as unexpected. Yes, they knew the impact was coming, but there wouldn't have been instantaneous updates on what was happening, and what was going to happen, as would have been the case with manoeuvres. It's much the same as with torpedo impacts - it's obvious that a torp's going to hit, as they've often got enough time to call a "brace for impact". The dampers still don't do much good though.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Fair enough.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I think itr was yelled "Inertial dampeners are offline!" right after the saucer was hit by the shockwave. Though I could be remembering any of the other episodes with crashes.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Its "Primary Stabelizers offline" - whatever they are - followed by "Engaging secondary systems"
"You ain't gonna get off down the trail a mile or two, and go missing your wife or something, like our last cook done, are you?"
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Oh. Then I must be remembering a Voyager ep.kostmayer wrote:Its "Primary Stabelizers offline" - whatever they are - followed by "Engaging secondary systems"
Thats two messups in less than an hour.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
If the Inertial Dampeners were off completly the sudden stop likely would have killed most of the crew. I would say that they just can't handle that type of situation, sure they keep everyone from ending up as a red splatter but you still get knocked around.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I should have been more specific in my "bouncing off each other" post. I was seeing two ships passing close enough to each other for the two shield "bubbles" to touch each other, not as a defense against a full on collision. Should have been more specific. Sorry.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I'd just guess that an impact of that power was just to much for the dampeners to do, it probably did slow down the impact somewhat, no one was seriously injured.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Exactly. They were in a reactive, not proactive, situation; were probably at diminished capacity; and in any event were faced with a big sudden stop for which they weren't primarily designed.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
Agreed.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
What are people's opinions on a hypothetical TNG and DS9 remastered, such has been done (unseen by me) with TOS, with new FX shots where some of the kitbashed designs could be replaced by other ships, both ones from present canon and new, better designed vessels?
I've grown hostile to these kind of projects, largely thanks to a certain Mr G Lucas of Marin County, CA, USA, but some of the "Frankenstein ships" I would be glad to see the back of - the Curry Class in particular I can't bear to look at.
So do we accept these ships as inviolably canon, like it or not, or are people open to a little rewriting of ST history?
Personally, I'd be very cautiously in favour of changes, as long as the originals where not airbrushed from existence, as I feel it's important to be able to see things as they where first shown. It could also deal with some of the registry number and other inconsistencies.
I've grown hostile to these kind of projects, largely thanks to a certain Mr G Lucas of Marin County, CA, USA, but some of the "Frankenstein ships" I would be glad to see the back of - the Curry Class in particular I can't bear to look at.
So do we accept these ships as inviolably canon, like it or not, or are people open to a little rewriting of ST history?
Personally, I'd be very cautiously in favour of changes, as long as the originals where not airbrushed from existence, as I feel it's important to be able to see things as they where first shown. It could also deal with some of the registry number and other inconsistencies.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Graham's Frankestien Fleet
I like the remastered TOS over the original but thats not saying much.
Honestly I dont think TNG or DS9 need remastering, maybe a few of the very early TNG episodes but mostly they are fine.
Honestly I dont think TNG or DS9 need remastering, maybe a few of the very early TNG episodes but mostly they are fine.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.