End of Enterprise-D

Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:30 pm

instead of giving up whatever else the Romulans might have asked for - something perhaps a little dearer, like inhabited planets, etc.

Post by **Teaos** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:10 am

As much as I hate to say it I get the feeling the Federation will bend over backwards for peace. Thus they would sign anything to prevent war.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:45 am

:::the necromancer strikes again::::

After the TNG Tech Manual, it's not like we didn't KNOW that the E-D wasn't gonna get destroyed, right? After reading that chapter in the end of the book, about the "visions" they were having for the E-E already. But, it was a REALLY weak way, for a ship I came to love, to go down.

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:49 am

Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.

Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:00 am

stitch626 wrote:Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.

Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.

Three Vorchas, in a pitched battle.

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:01 am

Mark wrote:
stitch626 wrote:Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.

Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.
Three Vorchas, in a pitched battle.

Even better. And with two BoP's, and while deffending a poor frieghter.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:06 am

Yeah....so crippled Riker and Worf are standing in airlocks with E-suits and rifles, holding 'em off

Post by **Teaos** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:37 am

The saucer landing on the planet was cool even if the way to happened wasnt.

kostmayer · Post by **kostmayer** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:20 am

The crash sequence was brilliant, but shields or not, the Enterprise should have been able to take that Klingon ship. A full weapons burst should have done it.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:14 pm

It was pretty pathetic to be honest. the E-D should have blown that klingon ship to hell in seconds, shields or not.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:38 pm

Indeed. Purely ridiculous.
I mean, I hated that ship, but I'd like it to at least have gone down with a little dignity.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:33 pm

Shooting the f*ck outta that klingn lump of turd would be appropriate.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:18 pm

Yet again writers ruin something so simple.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:20 pm

Yes, even in death the GCS is a disapointment.
Man, is there anything that ship did right?

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:34 pm

Yep. The destruction of the Yamatowas well done, IMO.

End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D

Re: End of Enterprise-D