Designing a vessel is easy. Making it unique on the other hand is hard.Reliant121 wrote: Personally, i think designing your own vessels is nowhere near as complicated as Teaos suggested, and you can make your own fairly easily.
Gamma Mission Prep
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
It doesnt necessarily need to be unique in every way. I tend to borrow little bits from here. All of my RSE are loosely based on another ship for stats. the T'Caren was based on the Klingon BOP, the Verata was based on the Norexan.
With UFP, all you need to do is design an effective replacement ship for the brief your making. Make it purpose designed. UFP tried too much to be Jack of all trades. It dont work.
With UFP, all you need to do is design an effective replacement ship for the brief your making. Make it purpose designed. UFP tried too much to be Jack of all trades. It dont work.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Designing the Paladin was complicated due tothe way I went about it. Having it designed by multiple people.
But in general it is stilh hard to make an original believeable ship. Sure just making a replacement is easier but it is also more boring.
But in general it is stilh hard to make an original believeable ship. Sure just making a replacement is easier but it is also more boring.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
What Thorin was suggesting was upping the current ships to fit a new tech. why not just create a new vessel and keep the originals?
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Because they already have ships, they just don't use them very well. I'd always imagined that the Sovereign, for example, was made to be a battlecruiser (a poor one, albeit) for its lifetime. It was made with upgrades in mind, the same with the Prometheus. Other ships, like the Galaxy and Defiant, don't. Just my opinion. Though I quite like my new Galaxy - I've made it with a sort of battleship in mind - big, bulky, slow(ish), and powerful.Reliant121 wrote:What Thorin was suggesting was upping the current ships to fit a new tech. why not just create a new vessel and keep the originals?
But re creating new ships - for SF, they already have pretty much every ship to fit a role, apart from the Paladin, which is why it had probably more work required. Creating a battlecruiser would take the Sovereign and build on it. Creating a scout would take the Intrepid and build on it. Creating a destroyer would take the Defiant and build on it... etc etc.
80085
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
So, when are we actually going to get this on a roll?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:So, when are we actually going to get this on a roll?
Teaos wrote:Ok people I am probably goign to start Gamma mission this time tomorrow. I have to update the crew lists with the lattest bios along with the ship write ups and the station we are using along with a more complee mission brief. Then I have to write up the start post, so it might be two days since there is quite a lot for me to do. Depends on how busy I am tomorrow.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
You know that's more helpful when I know when he said that.Mikey wrote:Blackstar the Chakat wrote:So, when are we actually going to get this on a roll?Teaos wrote:Ok people I am probably goign to start Gamma mission this time tomorrow. I have to update the crew lists with the lattest bios along with the ship write ups and the station we are using along with a more complee mission brief. Then I have to write up the start post, so it might be two days since there is quite a lot for me to do. Depends on how busy I am tomorrow.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
He said it this evening/afternoon. Try reading through the pages.
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
If there's any spare spaces on any of the ships as you go through the crew roster, can you stick my guys down in some spaces Teaos, please; just find anything suitable, I've got the following (with a short appropriate description to help in positioning):
Lieutenant Commander Anker Zionex: former fighter pilot, possible Chief of Operations etc
Lieutenant Commander Grahame Niles: former XO of tactical department, possible [crappy] ship XO, chief tactical officer etc
Master Chief Petty Officer Charles Nelson: former tactical engineer, possible engineer/operations officer etc
Lieutenant Smith: former science dude, astrometrics, Chief Science officer, etc
Lieutenant Gilliteo: pretty much anywhere except engineering/helm
Lieutenant Jones: as above
So everyone knows - I'm going to Leeds festival (you may have seen the list of bands I gave inc. Rage, Metallica etc) tomorrow early (5am, ugh!), and won't be back til Monday at earliest, so you miss my early posting. Mikey in particular - feel free to use my character in the same sort of light as he was used before - but more experienced, more at ease etc - and the same with my Chief Engineer (Liam, Jonathan's middle-brother).
Lieutenant Commander Anker Zionex: former fighter pilot, possible Chief of Operations etc
Lieutenant Commander Grahame Niles: former XO of tactical department, possible [crappy] ship XO, chief tactical officer etc
Master Chief Petty Officer Charles Nelson: former tactical engineer, possible engineer/operations officer etc
Lieutenant Smith: former science dude, astrometrics, Chief Science officer, etc
Lieutenant Gilliteo: pretty much anywhere except engineering/helm
Lieutenant Jones: as above
So everyone knows - I'm going to Leeds festival (you may have seen the list of bands I gave inc. Rage, Metallica etc) tomorrow early (5am, ugh!), and won't be back til Monday at earliest, so you miss my early posting. Mikey in particular - feel free to use my character in the same sort of light as he was used before - but more experienced, more at ease etc - and the same with my Chief Engineer (Liam, Jonathan's middle-brother).
80085
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
I did, but there were two or three pages of stuff from just today.Reliant121 wrote:He said it this evening/afternoon. Try reading through the pages.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Well, don't call me unhelpful for pointing out the bit that you missed.
PS Thorin - I'm sure at least one of the Hewer bros. will be included. Remember, we still have our fighter complement, if any of your guys want to remain space jockeys.
PS Thorin - I'm sure at least one of the Hewer bros. will be included. Remember, we still have our fighter complement, if any of your guys want to remain space jockeys.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
We still using the old peregrenes? That should be one of our next projects you know. Creating an effective fighter.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Actually, we have a new fighter developed for the original Daystrom mission. It may need a tweak, but they're relatively young. Nothing to really bother with.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Gamma Mission Prep
Agreed. The fighters are alright as they are, IMO.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"