And as I've already pointed out, there's already enough flat space on your average planet that you wouldn't need to worry about it until you're building a veritable Coruscant.Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Well, my reason has changed I admit, but the idea of flattening the surface is still an efficient concept with maximizing the usable surface area for whatever they may need, like more manufacturing facilities or areas for testing new weapons they've assimilated and enhanced with borg technology.
What's infuriating is your persistent habit of hopping around between arguments, coming out with more and more ludicrous suggestions to try and justify what's already been disproved. Unless you've got solid evidence that Genesis is capable of the detailed programming required to pull off this planet-flattening trick, then this whole argument that "it would be more efficient for x, y, z reasons" is irrelevent, so drop it.So yes, my reasons for why it's efficient has changed, but the basic concept of it being efficient has not. I'm sorry if you find this frustrating.