There was "Peak Performance", where a single hit from a Marauder knocked out all the weapons.Mikey wrote:I may be showing my old-timer's disease, but I don't remember an incident in TNG of a GCS being endangered due to inability to defend itself; all the problems we saw, IIRC, were due to computer security issues, strange unexplained-danger-of-the-week, poor warp core safety protocols, or some such.
Galaxy Class Capability
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Indeed, for all we know, other mainstay designs like the everlasting Excelsior and even the Connie may have (even likely would have) suffered their share of nits and flaws which were worked out over their first decade in service; we may partly "rationalize" some of the E-D's foibles by the fact she was, at the time, of a new class of ship.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
And almost always the ship sent to deal with the unknown or the dangerous.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Hell, we know Excelsior did, although she was an experimental ship.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
First off, you can't compare the Excelsior to the GCS. Its not a fair match. SF still had IQ when they built the Excelsior.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
An excellently designed frigate would still lose to a badly-designed battleship.Deepcrush wrote:First off, you can't compare the Excelsior to the GCS. Its not a fair match. SF still had IQ when they built the Excelsior.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Wasn't the E-D on super-low-power training-mode shields and weapons at the time?Captain Seafort wrote:There was "Peak Performance", where a single hit from a Marauder knocked out all the weapons.Mikey wrote:I may be showing my old-timer's disease, but I don't remember an incident in TNG of a GCS being endangered due to inability to defend itself; all the problems we saw, IIRC, were due to computer security issues, strange unexplained-danger-of-the-week, poor warp core safety protocols, or some such.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Yep - the hit fused the weapons into that mode. Doesn't change the fact that it shows that the weapons have a single-point-of-failure.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
It is admittedly a design flaw; however, saying that it has a direct bearing on what the E-D's ability would have been to fight off the Marauder at full power is fallacious.Captain Seafort wrote:Yep - the hit fused the weapons into that mode. Doesn't change the fact that it shows that the weapons have a single-point-of-failure.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Well, the NX-2000 did only say hello to Captain Styles when he tried to go to Transwarp rather than go kaboom, so that's something
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
I would say that it does have a direct effect - it shows that a single hit at the right point can affect the power supply to all the ship's weapons, probably by knocking out the control lines rather than the power, given that Roga Danar did something very similar to the internal sensors in "The Hunted". It would certainly be less effective as a deliberate tactic, given that it was a lucky hit with reduced shields, but the know phenomenon of bleed-through means that the possibility of a similar event occuring in battle cannot be discounted.Mikey wrote:It is admittedly a design flaw; however, saying that it has a direct bearing on what the E-D's ability would have been to fight off the Marauder at full power is fallacious.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Anything's possible, of course; but I imagine if it were as debilitating a flaw as that when shields were up, we would have seen it happen a lot - the E-D was in dire straits fairly regularly.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
The fact that it's a flaw that needs a lucky hit to take advantage of it doesn't change the fact that it's a flaw. HMS Sheffield was incredibly unlucky that the Exocet that hit her broke the main water line. Doesn't change the fact that only having one was stupid, and led to the abandonment and subsequent loss of the ship.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
Just remember that the modernized Excelsior is an equal to even the latest GCS. Again, Excelsior for the win.Captain Seafort wrote:An excellently designed frigate would still lose to a badly-designed battleship.Deepcrush wrote:First off, you can't compare the Excelsior to the GCS. Its not a fair match. SF still had IQ when they built the Excelsior.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Galaxy Class Capability
A refit of unknown resource intensity and production run proved about equal to a dedicated warship a fraction of the size of a GCS. The Lakota is powerful, almost certainly more powerful, ton-for-ton, than a Galaxy, but I'd be very surprised if she were equal to even a Batch-I Galaxy, let alone one of the war-standard ships.Deepcrush wrote:Just remember that the modernized Excelsior is an equal to even the latest GCS. Again, Excelsior for the win.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.