Saber class

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:36 pm

We may disagree on a daily basis, but you have to admit; I'm thorough when it comes to researching stuff.

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:02 pm

I agree. Nice work there, Rochey. The number of tubes seems pretty obvious from those shots.

Post by **Teaos** » Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:41 am

I was hoping that'd catch on.

Yeah well I still coined the original TR-116 saying

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:58 pm

Is someone really trying to argue against the Akira being a torp boat? Who the hell was that stupid! I need to start insulting them ASAP!

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:04 pm

Sure wasn't me. I'd say the designer of the ship saying it has 15 tubes means it has 15 tubes, regardless of whether we saw all of them in action.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:31 pm

Smart guy, so then who was it?

I have the urge to hurt someone's feelings!

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:56 pm

What, you can't be bothered to read back through? Get one of your lackeys to do it.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:20 pm

It was mlsnoopy.

I think he gave up after I laid down airtight evidence against his claims.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:29 pm

Hey snoopy snoopy! Hey ohhh! *kicks him in the tail bone."

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:32 am

Very nice analisis Rochey.
I'm also getting tired of people questioning it. The 15 tt's are canon (or as close to canon as you can get). They are al visible on the models in the various eps and they have been consistently mentioned by the ships designers and the producers.

Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:02 am

That certainly was some nice work by Rochey. I think, though, that for purposes of this discussion, we don't need to know a number of tubes more exact than "a butt-load." Having even APPROXIMATELY as many as the Akira-class does pretty much signifies her INTENDED, if notapplied, role.

Post by **Teaos** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:06 am

Yeah back in the day SF never used ships properly. Although now they are doing a better job, the Defiant was used well most of the time, the Intrepid filled its roll and the Nova and Prommy were both well placed.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:25 am

Thanks, guys.

And yeah, the amount of torp tubes on the thing clearly shows what it's intended for.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:00 pm

Rochey wrote:Thanks, guys.

And yeah, the amount of torp tubes on the thing clearly shows what it's intended for.

You mean for as a close combat battleship right!

Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:31 pm

Deepcrush wrote:
Rochey wrote:Thanks, guys.

And yeah, the amount of torp tubes on the thing clearly shows what it's intended for.
You mean for as a close combat battleship right!

NOW you're thinking like Starfleet.

Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class

Re: Saber class