Saucer Seperation
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Saucer Seperation
I is always making a sense.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
Plus, aren't the impulse engines wholly or partly contained in the saucer? That means using only the star drive section, you'd be losing a major secondary power source.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
I don't recall the TNG TM saying anything about a limit to the number of disconnects/reconnects. I don't have it to hand to check though.
The real world reason why they dropped the idea was that it was too clunky for the story. Spend screentime disconnecting, reconnecting. Less possibility for using stock FX footage. That kind of thing. They came up with excuses like "I want the power of the impulse engines available" and such. Which makes some sense. The Saucer also has the two longest phaser arrays on the ship, which has to be of some sort of use.
But youhave to wonder, if all that is such an important factor, why have the disconnect option at all? Doesn't seem to be a lot it accomplishes that lifeboats don't.
The real world reason why they dropped the idea was that it was too clunky for the story. Spend screentime disconnecting, reconnecting. Less possibility for using stock FX footage. That kind of thing. They came up with excuses like "I want the power of the impulse engines available" and such. Which makes some sense. The Saucer also has the two longest phaser arrays on the ship, which has to be of some sort of use.
But youhave to wonder, if all that is such an important factor, why have the disconnect option at all? Doesn't seem to be a lot it accomplishes that lifeboats don't.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Saucer Seperation
I'm sure you're all going to be shocked to hear me suggest this, but my guess would be that the writers are morons.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
Sometimes I wonder why you actually watch Star Trek. Are you one of those folks who like yelling at the TV?Rochey wrote:I'm sure you're all going to be shocked to hear me suggest this, but my guess would be that the writers are morons.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
I only do that while watching sporting events. You know, because I'm so good that I sit and watch them from home.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
I know that the original concept was to give the families and various civvies a way to escape a coming battle (and IIRC this option was available on the Big E in TOS, though it was permanent) but honestly, why wasn't there a warp drive on it?
"Ok, lets seperate the ship and hope to frag that we don't get destroyed and the enemy doubles back and destroys all our families that are now years away from a Starbase."
Once again, great concept. Dismal execution.
"Ok, lets seperate the ship and hope to frag that we don't get destroyed and the enemy doubles back and destroys all our families that are now years away from a Starbase."
Once again, great concept. Dismal execution.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Saucer Seperation
I remember reading something like that, but I can't find it.I don't recall the TNG TM saying anything about a limit to the number of disconnects/reconnects. I don't have it to hand to check though
A rare occasion were we agree. The New Frontier series compensated for the weakness somewhat with the Excalibur-A having a 'warp sled' built into the saucer giving it limited warp capabilities. Even if it can only reach warp 2 that's better then nothing. Ironically it wasn't used to escape but for separated combat instead."Ok, lets seperate the ship and hope to frag that we don't get destroyed and the enemy doubles back and destroys all our families that are now years away from a Starbase."
Once again, great concept. Dismal execution.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
Really it makes sense. That's got to cause all kinds of stress and there are large moving parts involved. Sooner or later it's going to break and even with the most basic connectors in RL, you reach a point where they need to be replaced.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
I remember reading something like that, but I can't find it.
Rather like the warp sled in TMP. Good idea.A rare occasion were we agree. The New Frontier series compensated for the weakness somewhat with the Excalibur-A having a 'warp sled' built into the saucer giving it limited warp capabilities. Even if it can only reach warp 2 that's better then nothing. Ironically it wasn't used to escape but for separated combat instead.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Saucer Seperation
I just thought of another hastle. The TM mentions that the seperated ships have different flight characteristics then in combined mode. The conn officers would all have to be trained in flying for the equivilent of three different ships.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Saucer Seperation
Not at all. Despite what it may seem like, I liked TOS, TNG and DS9. They were all good series with good plots. VOY and ENT were where the show really went downhill.Sometimes I wonder why you actually watch Star Trek. Are you one of those folks who like yelling at the TV?
My problem isn't with the show itself, just the idiocy that is displayed in the show.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Saucer Seperation
I have this mental image of you sitting there muttering "morons! Idiots! Oh god, look at that! So stupid!"Rochey wrote:Not at all. Despite what it may seem like, I liked TOS, TNG and DS9. They were all good series with good plots. VOY and ENT were where the show really went downhill.Sometimes I wonder why you actually watch Star Trek. Are you one of those folks who like yelling at the TV?
My problem isn't with the show itself, just the idiocy that is displayed in the show.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Saucer Seperation
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Saucer Seperation
You do know the mirror universe was created to satisfy Rocheys need for violence?
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Saucer Seperation
And yet it doesn't even come close to meeting mine.Teaos wrote:You do know the mirror universe was created to satisfy Rocheys need for violence?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu