What would you take?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
I imagine it would be done at a relatively slow rate (dammit! I just agreed with Seafort again!) for two reasons: it takes a definite amount of energy to effect an M-to-AM conversion, and during normal replenishment there would be no need to turn that inot a high rate of power used; and there is a finite amount of AM storage space.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: What would you take?
The fact there is a finite amount of AM storage space shouldn't effect it - considering that it could be under an indefinite amount of compression (well, there would be a cap around the singularity level ). I don't get what you're saying in the first half of your sentence, though. If it takes a set amount of energy to convert it, and we don't know what that set amount is, and we don't know the output of the fusion reactors, then it'd be impossible to say it's a particularly slow or fast rate. And this is only applicable when the conversion energy is greater than the mass-energy, if the conversion energy was less than the mass-energy, it would be very fast. While we don't know either way, I'd hazard a guess than the conversion energy was less simply going by the knowledge there is no lower limit for the energy requirements for the conversion, and the fact that the energy requirements currently trend downwards and will only ever trend downwards.
80085
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
I'd think you'd want to stop compression well short of creating an event horizon.
And what I meant was that no matter what the actual energy required for conversion, doing it slower means less power drawn than doing it faster.
And what I meant was that no matter what the actual energy required for conversion, doing it slower means less power drawn than doing it faster.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: What would you take?
Yes, but you're just sitting in a nebula not doing much anyway. If you need shields or the like, just send half of the created antimatter to the warp core, and half to storage until you've filled up. A faster rate of fusion means you get anti-matter quicker, and I'd hazard a guess it's more important to have fuel available for the warp core than for the impulse engines.Mikey wrote: And what I meant was that no matter what the actual energy required for conversion, doing it slower means less power drawn than doing it faster.
80085
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
Yes, of course; I was referring to situations when the ship was actually doing something other than sitting in a deuterium-rich nebula.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: What would you take?
Like battleing the Kazon, over and over and...
While I didn't like the idea at first, your arguments are persuasive. Making antimatter does make sense for Voyager's situation, though less so (IMO) for other ships.
While I didn't like the idea at first, your arguments are persuasive. Making antimatter does make sense for Voyager's situation, though less so (IMO) for other ships.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: What would you take?
I'd imagine it'd be pretty much impossible for Voy to survive without some sort of AM creating facilities. Unless, of course, they happened to run into a planet of sufficiently advanced tech who were happy to sell them some every time they ran low on the stuff.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
So, Seafort, Rochey, Mikey, Thorin and myself all agree on something.Rochey wrote:I'd imagine it'd be pretty much impossible for Voy to survive without some sort of AM creating facilities. Unless, of course, they happened to run into a planet of sufficiently advanced tech who were happy to sell them some every time they ran low on the stuff.
*KABOOM!*
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: What would you take?
Oh, man, if Teaos agrees then I think we'll end up breaking reality.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
If Teaos agrees, I'm going to tell Ian to go back to the old forum.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: What would you take?
I agree, but that doesn't mean anything.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: What would you take?
I would take Data... by our times defenisions he would be considered hardware, not a person.
And futhermore he would know alot of stuff. Given enought time he could probaly build phasers, replicators, warpcores ect.
and the argument that you can get the database but not the data does not apply here. If you where to strip out all the info from Data he would not be Data, he would be B4 or something simular. So to get Data you would also get all that he knows.
Yeah yeah I know Im bending the rules, but I have yet to brake them
And futhermore he would know alot of stuff. Given enought time he could probaly build phasers, replicators, warpcores ect.
and the argument that you can get the database but not the data does not apply here. If you where to strip out all the info from Data he would not be Data, he would be B4 or something simular. So to get Data you would also get all that he knows.
Yeah yeah I know Im bending the rules, but I have yet to brake them
No, I'm not drunk, I just cant spell that well.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: What would you take?
I want 3 million dollars transfered to my bank account or I'll do it... I'll agree with you all.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What would you take?
$3 million US? That's like $1.25 NZ, right?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What would you take?
He's a computer by the definition of any era. The question asked in "The Measure of a Man", among others, is whether he's a person as well.Greger wrote:I would take Data... by our times defenisions he would be considered hardware, not a person.
The OP specifically stated that only the actually piece of kit is allowed. This would fall under the category of "no making phasers with your replicator".And futhermore he would know alot of stuff. Given enought time he could probaly build phasers, replicators, warpcores ect.
The difference between Data and B4 is one of sophistication, not of what information they store. Strip out his knowledge of Trek technology and Data would still be a sapient android, albeit probably with a slightly different personality to the one we see.and the argument that you can get the database but not the data does not apply here. If you where to strip out all the info from Data he would not be Data, he would be B4 or something simular. So to get Data you would also get all that he knows.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.