You're a Captain,you get to pick your starship. Which class?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat May 03, 2008 6:38 pm

I wasn't challenging hir at all. I was pointing out that we'd been through that debate before, and that we'd shown hir position to be wrong. Shi was the one who brought up hir position again, I was just pointing out that we'd already disproven it.

Duskofdead · Post by **Duskofdead** » Sat May 03, 2008 6:44 pm

Rochey wrote:I wasn't challenging hir at all. I was pointing out that we'd been through that debate before, and that we'd shown hir position to be wrong. Shi was the one who brought up hir position again, I was just pointing out that we'd already disproven it.

Feel better?

Blackstar the Chakat · Sat May 03, 2008 6:53 pm

Rochey wrote:I wasn't challenging hir at all. I was pointing out that we'd been through that debate before, and that we'd shown hir position to be wrong. Shi was the one who brought up hir position again, I was just pointing out that we'd already disproven it.

How is that not a challenge? You try something like that and the average guy will pop ya one.

Duskofdead · Post by **Duskofdead** » Sat May 03, 2008 7:06 pm

ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Rochey wrote:I wasn't challenging hir at all. I was pointing out that we'd been through that debate before, and that we'd shown hir position to be wrong. Shi was the one who brought up hir position again, I was just pointing out that we'd already disproven it.
How is that not a challenge? You try something like that and the average guy will pop ya one.

A lot of obnoxious smugness passes around here because it's the internet. It's just a higher brow version of misspelled flaming.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat May 03, 2008 7:07 pm

Dusk wrote:Feel better?

What?

Blackstar wrote:How is that not a challenge?

Since when was pointing out you're bringing up an already debunked topic a challenge?

Blackstar the Chakat · Sat May 03, 2008 7:28 pm

Rochey wrote:
Blackstar wrote:How is that not a challenge?
Since when was pointing out you're bringing up an already debunked topic a challenge?

You don't think going "Ha ha, I beat you before" isn't going to get someone rilled up? Normally I would've risen to the challenge, but I'm just tired of that topic, escpecially since a lot of it doesn't make sense.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat May 03, 2008 7:48 pm

You don't think going "Ha ha, I beat you before" isn't going to get someone rilled up?

Of course it would. Good thing I never actualy said that, then.

Duskofdead · Post by **Duskofdead** » Sat May 03, 2008 8:18 pm

Rochey wrote:
You don't think going "Ha ha, I beat you before" isn't going to get someone rilled up?
Of course it would. Good thing I never actualy said that, then.

Nevertheless you were being prodding and immature, and you know it. Just drop it.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat May 03, 2008 8:23 pm

*sigh*
How was pointing out we'd debunked that claim being "immature"?

Blackstar the Chakat · Sat May 03, 2008 8:29 pm

Rochey wrote:*sigh*
How was pointing out we'd debunked that claim being "immature"?

Because that's the adult equivient of going, "Ha ha, I beat you." I know it, Dusk knows it, and you know it, so stop playing innocent.

Duskofdead · Post by **Duskofdead** » Sat May 03, 2008 8:31 pm

Rochey wrote:*sigh*
How was pointing out we'd debunked that claim being "immature"?

Well...

Yes, I can see why you might not want to get back into that debate again. What with being shown to be wrong, and all that.

If you don't see how this is immature, then I don't know how to enlighten you.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat May 03, 2008 9:29 pm

I wasn't in the mood for going back into that debate, hence my rather blunt pointing out that it had already been finished. Happy?

Post by **Mikey** » Sat May 03, 2008 9:30 pm

I like chili dogs.

Sorry for the abrupt change of direction, but that needed to stop.

Blackstar the Chakat · Sat May 03, 2008 9:31 pm

Rochey wrote:I wasn't in the mood for going back into that debate, hence my rather blunt pointing out that it had already been finished. Happy?

Depends. Are you admitting you were acting immature? (And before you say something about me being immature, I'm only 19. I'm allowed to be immature

)

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Sat May 03, 2008 9:33 pm

The drone KE-shield argument is probably the oldest on the forum - IIRC, it was a similar debate between Graham and me that derailed the original TR-116 thread. That's how old it is.