Population of the Federation
- I Am Spartacus
- Lieutenant jg
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:22 am
- Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Population of the Federation
Now I took Picard's "over 150" comment in First Contact to mean that there are 150 member states in the UFP, a federal republic type organization. Many of these member states, such as Earth, could occupy several dozen systems with populations into the hundreds of billions. Even if there are just 1,000 inhabited worlds in the Federation, if each averages 1 billion we're up to 1 trillion people easily. If the Earth of the 24th century has 15 billion people, that's up to fifteen worlds somewhere else that could only have a few thousand or less to keep up this average.
I don't think it's a stretch at all to suggest that the Federation is comprised of over a trillion people.
Thoughts?
I don't think it's a stretch at all to suggest that the Federation is comprised of over a trillion people.
Thoughts?
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Here is my totally made up math.
150 Home planets each with about 10 billion each (I'm going to be conservative)
= 150 Billion.
average 20 colony worlds each population 1 billion each.
150x20x1= 300
300+150= 450 round up to 500
I say around 500 Billion.
150 Home planets each with about 10 billion each (I'm going to be conservative)
= 150 Billion.
average 20 colony worlds each population 1 billion each.
150x20x1= 300
300+150= 450 round up to 500
I say around 500 Billion.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
I hate to tell you, but 150 planets times 10 billion each = 1,500 billion or 1.5 trillion =)Teaos wrote:Here is my totally made up math.
150 Home planets each with about 10 billion each (I'm going to be conservative)
= 150 Billion.
average 20 colony worlds each population 1 billion each.
150x20x1= 300
300+150= 450 round up to 500
I say around 500 Billion.
20 billion people PER world via colonies, times 150 worlds equals another 3,000 billion, or 3 trillion.
That's 4.5 trillion people.
+1 for the history major with no college math making the correction
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
- I Am Spartacus
- Lieutenant jg
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:22 am
- Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
First of all, I think that a lot of the worlds in the Federation are going to be either uninhabited or sparsely populated, ie tens of thousands at most. While in the heartland, it's easily possible and economically viable to take a lifeless world (ie. the moon) and populate it, it wouldn't be so to do the same to an equally lifeless world.
To my knowledge, Trek has yet to firmly establish any terraforming methods, so we're left with the notion that only previously inhabitable worlds are populated on a significant scale.
So I think that around a trillion is right on the mark.
With that given, I don't see how the Federation could not have produced legions of ships on demand for the Dominion war. Each only requires a crew of several hundred on average, and with industrial grade replicators Starfleet should be able to call on fleets of thousands in the span of just a few months, with that size of a population and economy powering it...
To my knowledge, Trek has yet to firmly establish any terraforming methods, so we're left with the notion that only previously inhabitable worlds are populated on a significant scale.
So I think that around a trillion is right on the mark.
With that given, I don't see how the Federation could not have produced legions of ships on demand for the Dominion war. Each only requires a crew of several hundred on average, and with industrial grade replicators Starfleet should be able to call on fleets of thousands in the span of just a few months, with that size of a population and economy powering it...
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Agreed with the "over 150" comment meaning member worlds like Vulcan and Earth. And yes, population of those worlds is probably in the 10 billion ballpark. So 1500 billion right there.
Kirk said that "we're on a thousand worlds and spreading out" in TOS Metamorphosis... if by "we" he meant the Federation, then by TNG times I would expect this to double since TOS is about halfway between TNG and the founding of the Federation.
So 2,000 colony worlds. Many Trek worlds seem to be sparsely populated... a few million to a few billion would be my guess. Call it an average of 1 billion each, for 2,000 billion.
So total UFP population would be around 3,500 billion.
It's worth noting that in "Statistical Probabilities" Bashir estimated that a Federation defeat in the Dominion war would result in 900 billion Federation casualties; yet the remaining population would be sufficient that in five generations an uprising against the Dominion would begin that would destroy the Dominion within a generation. To me that seems to indicate that the loss of 900 billion would not be that massive a blow.
So yeah, a population in the trillions is definitely the right ballpark.
Kirk said that "we're on a thousand worlds and spreading out" in TOS Metamorphosis... if by "we" he meant the Federation, then by TNG times I would expect this to double since TOS is about halfway between TNG and the founding of the Federation.
So 2,000 colony worlds. Many Trek worlds seem to be sparsely populated... a few million to a few billion would be my guess. Call it an average of 1 billion each, for 2,000 billion.
So total UFP population would be around 3,500 billion.
It's worth noting that in "Statistical Probabilities" Bashir estimated that a Federation defeat in the Dominion war would result in 900 billion Federation casualties; yet the remaining population would be sufficient that in five generations an uprising against the Dominion would begin that would destroy the Dominion within a generation. To me that seems to indicate that the loss of 900 billion would not be that massive a blow.
So yeah, a population in the trillions is definitely the right ballpark.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
I'm pretty sure there was a planet being terraformed in Enterpirse. The Andorians did it and the Vulcans stole it. Sine both are now in the Federation we would have the tech.To my knowledge, Trek has yet to firmly establish any terraforming methods, so we're left with the notion that only previously inhabitable worlds are populated on a significant scale.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Probably in the Trillions, based on Bashir's statement, but I think you're overestimating the colonial populations - Khitomer only had 4000 people at the time of the Romulan attack, and the Fed colony destroyed by the Husnock in "The Survivors" had a population of 11,000, so that seems to be about standard for colony worlds. Having said that, it's debateable whether Kirk was refering to the Federation or just humans when he mentioned the thousand worlds - he may have limited it because he was talking to Cochrane, and refering to the direct effect of Cochrane's achievement - humanity's expansion into deep space.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Captain Peabody
- Lieutenant jg
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:31 am
- Location: Birmingham, AL, USA
Actually, there have been several instances of terraforming projects in Trek, most notably TNG's "Home Soil" (getting this information from Memory Alpha, as I've not seen the episodes in question), "Sub Rosa" (which takes place on a previously terraformed colony), and DS9's "Second Sight" (which I actually have seen). All in all, I'd say terraforming is a pretty well established technology.To my knowledge, Trek has yet to firmly establish any terraforming methods, so we're left with the notion that only previously inhabitable worlds are populated on a significant scale.
"Lo, blessed are our ears for they have heard;
Yea, blessed are our eyes for they have seen:
Let the thunder break on man and beast and bird
And the lightning. It is something to have been."
-The Great Minimum, G.K. Chesterton
Yea, blessed are our eyes for they have seen:
Let the thunder break on man and beast and bird
And the lightning. It is something to have been."
-The Great Minimum, G.K. Chesterton
- I Am Spartacus
- Lieutenant jg
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:22 am
- Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Perhaps a ship takes a certain amount of time no matter the resorses available. Thus it wouldn't be until a few years into the war we would start to see more numbers coming to play. Also you have to build the ship yards which takes even more time. Maybe if the Federation had a decade to prepare we would see tens of thousands of ships.
But then who mans them> Starfleet can only spit out so many people. Dropping standards helps a little but then you have less capable crews. And you could only drop them so far before it became dangerous.
The human attrition rate would crew starfeet before ships in my opinion.
But then who mans them> Starfleet can only spit out so many people. Dropping standards helps a little but then you have less capable crews. And you could only drop them so far before it became dangerous.
The human attrition rate would crew starfeet before ships in my opinion.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.