Cardassian's technology level

Deep Space Nine
SolkaTruesilver
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:49 am

Post by SolkaTruesilver »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Teaos wrote:But then you have a power issue. Big ships have such huge power that their shields and beam weapons are powerful. Smaller ships wouldn't have the power to penitrate the shields of a Galaxy that well.
That assumes that the shields are equally powerful in all directions - they aren't. From "Peak Performance" the Hathaway, despite being an 80-year-old piece of junk, was able to breach the Enterprise's aft shields when the Enterprise was distracted by Worf's sensor ghost, showing that either the ship angles its shields, or the aft shields are weak. Further evidence of weak aft shields is show in "Preemptive Strike" when Ro's Maquis ship was able to slip through a weak point between the nacelles.
Not to forget the Picard Manoeuver. If a ship detect TWO ennemy ships, it will focus its shields on the first, far away one, leaving itself vulnerable to be destroyed by a constellation class starship..

Wait a second. It always have been a totally illogic manoeuver/explanation..
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

How do you focus shields on ships? In that manuver the ships in in the same direction so they would be equally powerful for both ship positions.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I suppose you could just put more power into whatever is generating the shield at different points of the ship.
Of course, that depends on wether there are shield projectors on different points around the ship. If it's generated some other way then I have no idea.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Shields have been shown it be projected in parts. Such as Foward and rear shields. I also dont think it is also just a case of putting more power into them. I think they would have a upper limit depending on the hardware behind them.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

It would definately have an upper limit, you can't put unlimited amounts of power through anything. That idea was just a bit of guesswork.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Granitehewer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Teesside, England
Contact:

Post by Granitehewer »

Of course even if the cardassians are strategically, tactically or technology behind the federation, the cardassian morality and cultural nuances might make the cardassians more dangerous in a wartime situation....................
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

They do have a very diciplined and structured societly. In some ways thats good in others bad.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

They also seem somewhat more inherently warlike; but while it might affect the TYPES of technology they create, I don't think that the Cardassians' culture or tendencies has much of an effect on their LEVEL of technology...
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

A very diciplined and structured society is good for the military but it can hamper technological improvements over the long run.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Which is esactly what seems to have happened to the Cardies...
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Granitehewer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Teesside, England
Contact:

Post by Granitehewer »

If a certain cultural perspective or dominant policy predominates research, then other areas of research may be relegated or neglected, as it the time, these peripheral areas seem unimportant or irrelevant to the main goal, but in fact,these relegated areas when combined with the primary research concern, may in fact greatly augment it, for example the united federation of planets, specifically starfleet, may have a higher level of military technology than more belligerent races such as the klingons or cardassians, simply because the federation attitude to research is more holistic and they are able to combine different disciplines to supplement their weapons research,for example to improve target acquisition etc
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

True - the obverse is also true. In our own planet-wide history, for example, nothing has stimulated scientific and technological advancement as much as war (or the possibility of war) has.

However, this seems, for whatever reasons, to break down in the 'Trk universe. Using the example at hand, the Cardassians have always appeared to be a more warlike species than (current) humans. However, Cardassian tech has always been shown to be lacking compared to the Federation. Even in cases where the Cardassians have developed something novel, that development has been shown to be flawed and/or unreliable - e.g., the Dreadnaught [missile.]
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

But the more advanced technology gets the more branches it gets. If you only focus on those that are specifically war like you may reach a point were you slow right down in advancement. The Federation who focus' on all of the branchs may make a break through in a none war related one that cross's into weaponary somehow.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Granitehewer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Teesside, England
Contact:

Post by Granitehewer »

By the way guys, i might be a wee bit confuddled here, but (random point alert!), oh this bears little bearing to the posts but..... re: the galor, its been described as 'top of the line' but also somewhat derided, could this mean 'top of the line......for the cardassians' or that the sub-classes/upgrades or whatever of the galor, differ quite widely in capabilities?
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

That migth mean it is top of the line for a mass produced ship also. You can't build the best if you are building lots. Maybe they choose quanity over quality.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Post Reply