Memory Alpha to the rescue. It's the USS Biddeford.Nutso wrote:Star Trek Into Darkness Deleted Scene 02 Interesting model ship there. I can't make out the name. "BigBefore?"
The Youtube video thread!
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13106
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
GrahamKennedy wrote:Memory Alpha to the rescue. It's the USS Biddeford.Nutso wrote:Star Trek Into Darkness Deleted Scene 02 Interesting model ship there. I can't make out the name. "BigBefore?"
So... an actual ship you think even within the Abramsverse?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Don't see why not.
The registry is odd... very low for a Constitution class. But TOS registries were a bit all over the place, so who can say.
The registry is odd... very low for a Constitution class. But TOS registries were a bit all over the place, so who can say.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
- Location: Vienna
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Good thing that didn't make it into the final cut.......or how would they explain having an original timeline constitution suddenly hanging around?
Hmm..I don't know.....the simple fact that they even put this on in the first place goes to show how little they think of continuity/paying attention to detail. Don't know why this worked reasonably well in from the 60ties to mid 90ties and suddenly....noone can be bothered anymore to put a little thought into it.
Well..if the main story would be that more creative and blows you away...okay.....but since it's only rehashing the past...... . Imho it was a mistake letting Abrahms handle the sequel. I somehow have the feeling that his heart wasn't really in it and that they had no idea what they are supposed to do, other than making another star trek movie.
Hmm..I don't know.....the simple fact that they even put this on in the first place goes to show how little they think of continuity/paying attention to detail. Don't know why this worked reasonably well in from the 60ties to mid 90ties and suddenly....noone can be bothered anymore to put a little thought into it.
Well..if the main story would be that more creative and blows you away...okay.....but since it's only rehashing the past...... . Imho it was a mistake letting Abrahms handle the sequel. I somehow have the feeling that his heart wasn't really in it and that they had no idea what they are supposed to do, other than making another star trek movie.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
I'd assume they would explain it as a model of an old ship. What's the continuity problem? There's nothing at all to say that the Nero timeline doesn't have constitutions in it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: The Youtube video thread!
The Connie could have been designed earlier.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: The Youtube video thread!
I think the problem is that the Neo-Enterprise is identified as Constitution class. BUT, that doesn't mean the old Connie doesn't exist and they didn't decide to do a massive refit/redesign after the incident with the giant squid-ship.GrahamKennedy wrote:I'd assume they would explain it as a model of an old ship. What's the continuity problem? There's nothing at all to say that the Nero timeline doesn't have constitutions in it.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Someone on the Star Trek reddit suggested that that was a model of the proposed Constitution Class but when the Kelvin was destroyed by Nero, Star Fleet dumped that Biddleford design and went for bigger ships.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Or they just call that the Constellation class, or some other name.Sonic Glitch wrote:I think the problem is that the Neo-Enterprise is identified as Constitution class. BUT, that doesn't mean the old Connie doesn't exist and they didn't decide to do a massive refit/redesign after the incident with the giant squid-ship.GrahamKennedy wrote:I'd assume they would explain it as a model of an old ship. What's the continuity problem? There's nothing at all to say that the Nero timeline doesn't have constitutions in it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Maybe it was built too but the Enterprise was put into the newer bigger Connie class.
Though it would be like night and day though. I wonder if anyone tried to meld the Abramsprise with the original E-nil.
Though it would be like night and day though. I wonder if anyone tried to meld the Abramsprise with the original E-nil.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13106
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Okay, to get off the topic...
TJ Omega reviews a transforming washing machine.
It's short, and admittedly more for the WTF factor. But it's still pretty good. And funny.
TJ Omega reviews a transforming washing machine.
It's short, and admittedly more for the WTF factor. But it's still pretty good. And funny.
Re: The Youtube video thread!
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Okay, to get off the topic...
TJ Omega reviews a transforming washing machine.
It's short, and admittedly more for the WTF factor. But it's still pretty good. And funny.
I ......uh .....but .....no, just no......
God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
.................................................Billy Currington
.................................................Billy Currington
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Perfect gift for a little girl. Acclimate her to the housewife lifestyle.RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Okay, to get off the topic...
TJ Omega reviews a transforming washing machine.
It's short, and admittedly more for the WTF factor. But it's still pretty good. And funny.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13106
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: The Youtube video thread!
Be glad I didn't post his review for the worst Transformer of all time.Vic wrote:RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Okay, to get off the topic...
TJ Omega reviews a transforming washing machine.
It's short, and admittedly more for the WTF factor. But it's still pretty good. And funny.
I ......uh .....but .....no, just no......