The commander of the U.S. Navy's sleek new guided-missile destroyer, which launched late last week in Maine, has a name to match its space-age look: Captain Kirk.
Captain James Kirk, the prospective commanding officer of USS Zumwalt, will lead the 610-foot vessel, the Navy's largest destroyer and first of three new Zumwalt-class ships "designed for littoral operations and land attack," the Navy said.
Kirk, a native of Bethesda, Md., was commissioned at the U.S. Naval Academy in 1990 and has served in a variety posts as a "surface warfare officer," according to his online bio. "Ashore, Captain Kirk has served as Executive Assistant to the Navy’s Chief of Legislative Affairs and as an Action Officer on the Joint Staff."
Kirk obtained a master's degrees in national security studies at the U.S. Naval War College and U.S. Army War College, where he undoubtedly heard more than his share of "Star Trek" jokes.
The ship, which was moved from dry dock in Bath, Maine, to a pier on the Kennebec River on Friday, is loaded with new technologies, including "radar reflecting angles, a striking inward-sloping tumblehome hull" and advanced gun system.
The lead ship and class are named in honor of former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Elmo R. "Bud" Zumwalt Jr., who served as chief of naval operations from 1970 to 1974.
According to the Navy, construction on the first Zumwalt is "more than 87 percent complete," with remaining work on the hull scheduled to be completed before delivery in late 2014.
So who will serve as Capt. Kirk's "Spock" on the Zumwalt? According to the Navy, it's Cmdr. Jeffrey W. Hickox, who was named prospective executive officer of the ship.
Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Pretty much what it says on the tin.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
A few years down the line, they HAVE to name one of the new carriers the USS Enterprise and give this guy command.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
IIRC they actually are naming one of them Enterprise, so could be...GrahamKennedy wrote:A few years down the line, they HAVE to name one of the new carriers the USS Enterprise and give this guy command.
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
It will be awhile. After the Ford it will be the JFK and then Enterprise. CVN-80
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
After I showed you guys how insane the NSA is with their Star Trek room, how long will the Enterprise have to wait before some Trekkie Admiral matches James Kirk with her? It would be irresistible to me.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
... Yeah. Same, here.Nutso wrote:After I showed you guys how insane the NSA is with their Star Trek room, how long will the Enterprise have to wait before some Trekkie Admiral matches James Kirk with her? It would be irresistible to me.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Not quite direct command, but the Enterprise was part of Admiral Kirk's bombardment squadron off Utah and Omaha beaches on D-Day.GrahamKennedy wrote:A few years down the line, they HAVE to name one of the new carriers the USS Enterprise and give this guy command.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Which is why it probably won't happen. It would look like favoritism. Also ten years from now Captain Kirk will either be retired or an Admiral. He has been in the Navy since 1990.Nutso wrote:After I showed you guys how insane the NSA is with their Star Trek room, how long will the Enterprise have to wait before some Trekkie Admiral matches James Kirk with her? It would be irresistible to me.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Okay, so it'll be like the movies.
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
You know if Captain Kirk likes Indian food, or Pakistani food? He could very easily have run into someone named Khan there. Oh the hijinks that would ensue...McAvoy wrote:Which is why it probably won't happen. It would look like favoritism. Also ten years from now Captain Kirk will either be retired or an Admiral. He has been in the Navy since 1990.Nutso wrote:After I showed you guys how insane the NSA is with their Star Trek room, how long will the Enterprise have to wait before some Trekkie Admiral matches James Kirk with her? It would be irresistible to me.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Sure. Brand new Enterprise with some parts left over from the old Enterprises (CV-6 portholes and a couple of things and probably whatever they decide for the CVN-65) where a certain Admiral James Kirk takes command of the carrier group.RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Okay, so it'll be like the movies.
Or hell, someone could groom him to be a carrier captain for a year before retiring. Be a little promotional stunt.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Exactly, he doesn't have to be captain for years. Even just putting the guy in command for a couple days would be awesome.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Yeah, just as a stun or something.
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
Again which is why it will never happen. Its basically special treatment whether he is Captain for two minutes or two years.Tyyr wrote:Exactly, he doesn't have to be captain for years. Even just putting the guy in command for a couple days would be awesome.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Captain Kirk to command new destroyer
OR an excellent publicity stunt...McAvoy wrote:Again which is why it will never happen. Its basically special treatment whether he is Captain for two minutes or two years.Tyyr wrote:Exactly, he doesn't have to be captain for years. Even just putting the guy in command for a couple days would be awesome.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."