Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

In the real world
Post Reply
shran
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1289
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:28 pm
Contact:

Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by shran »

What a drag … Iceland considers prescription-only cigarettes

Tobacco bill proposes outlawing shop sales, with only doctors allowed to prescribe cigarettes to addicts unable to kick habit


Helen Pidd
guardian.co.uk, Monday 4 July 2011 12.35 BST

Iceland considering cigarette ban
Iceland is considering banning the shop sale of cigarettes to help society 'wake up' to the dangers of smoking.

Iceland is considering banning the sale of cigarettes and making them a prescription-only product.

The parliament in Reykjavik is to debate a proposal that would outlaw the sale of cigarettes in normal shops. Only pharmacies would be allowed to dispense them – initially to those aged 20 and up, and eventually only to those with a valid medical certificate.

The radical initiative is part of a 10-year plan that also aims to ban smoking in all public places, including pavements and parks, and in cars where children are present. Iceland also wants to follow Australia's lead by forcing tobacco manufacturers to sell cigarettes in plain, brown packaging plastered with health warnings rather than branding.

Under the mooted law, doctors will be encouraged to help addicts kick the habit with treatments and education programmes. If these do not work, they may prescribe cigarettes.

The private member's bill is sponsored by former health minister Siv Fridleifsdottir, who worked with the Icelandic Medical Association as well as a coalition of anti-tobacco groups to come up with the proposal. "The aim is to protect children and youngsters and stop them from starting to smoke," she said on Monday. The proposal would initially result in an increase in cigarette prices, said Fridleifsdottir, of "10% per year, in line with World Health Organisation proposals – evidence shows that a 10% increase results in a 4-8% reduction in consumption".

But by the end of the 10-year plan, prescription-only cigarettes should actually be cheaper than ever, according to Thorarinn Gudnason, president of the Icelandic Society of Cardiology, who helped draw up the proposal.

"Under our plan, smokers who are given prescriptions will be diagnosed as addicts, and we don't think the government should tax addicts."

Gudnason said current cigarette pricing in Iceland did not take into account the huge costs imposed on society by smokers. "A packet currently costs around 1,000 krona [£5.50], but if you factor in the cost of sick leave, reduced productivity due to smoking breaks and premature retirement on health grounds, it should really be 3,000 krona," he said.

The tobacco proposal also says that nicotine should be classed as an addictive substance. "It's as hard to give up nicotine as heroin, not in terms of the side effects, but in terms of the cravings and how quickly one becomes addicted," said Gudnason.

"We also want the government to license cigarettes like a medicine, which would mean they would have to go through the same rigorous trials as any other drug. I doubt cigarettes would ever get on the market now that we know the side-effects – lung cancer, heart attacks, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease."

Gudnason said 300 out of the 1,500 deaths in Iceland each year were caused by one of those three conditions.

"That's 20% of all deaths. We think that our proposals could lead to a significant reduction in smoking-related deaths – perhaps down to just 100 annually."

The proposal also suggests that tobacco smoke should be treated as a carcinogenic substance, and that it should be restricted in a similar way to other known carcinogens, because of the known effects of passive smoking.

Gudnason did a study five months after Iceland introduced a smoking ban in restaurants and pubs in 2007 and found a 21% reduction in acute coronary syndrome (heart attacks and near heart attacks) among non-smoking men, compared to five months before the ban.

A spokeswoman from the Icelandic ministry of welfare said on Monday that the proposal was "very serious" but had limited chances of success.

"Siv Fridleifsdottir is a very serious politician and this is a very serious proposal," said Anna Baldursdottir, political adviser to the minister of welfare, Gudbjartur Hannesson.

"Whether it not it eventually becomes law, I do not know. I seriously doubt it."

The idea will be debated in the Althing, Iceland's parliament, in the autumn, when politicians return from recess, she added.

Iceland has successfully halved smoking rates over the past 20 years. In 1991, 30% of the population smoked; today, only about 15% light up regularly, according to Baldursdottir, giving it the lowest smoking rates in Europe.

This success is attributed to huge increases in tobacco tax, which accounts for about 25% of the pack price, as well as the drop in disposable income among islanders since the financial crash of 2008.

Other countries have gone further. Bhutan has completely outlawed smoking and Finland hopes to follow suit by 2040.

Swedish surgeons now refuse to operate on smokers until they give up, because of the deleterious effect smoking has on the healing process, Gudnason added.

As an isolated island, Iceland arguably stands a greater chance of success with such draconian measures than other nations.

With no neighbouring countries and rigid customs controls at ports and airports, it will be difficult for anyone to smuggle in contraband cigarettes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... cigarettes

Lovely. My doctor recently told me I need to smoke more.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Mikey »

If you're going to ban them, then ban them. There are already prescription meds to assist nicotine addicts to kick the habit - prescribing cigarettes for smokers is pretty contrary to general medical thought, and a ridiculous step. As a nicotine addict myself, I think this idea is completely ludicrous. Either let people smoke, or don't - prescriptions should have nothing to do with the fact at all.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by BigJKU316 »

Iceland might be able to get away with it, as isolated as they are.

The rest of the world would be facing prohibition in the US during the 20's style conditions pretty quickly I would think. Suddenly there would be huge criminal money to be made selling something that was previously legal. Sounds like a really dumb idea.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Teaos »

Can I get official medical heroin?
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Giuseppe
Chief petty officer
Chief petty officer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:27 pm

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Giuseppe »

BigJKU316 wrote:Iceland might be able to get away with it, as isolated as they are.

The rest of the world would be facing prohibition in the US during the 20's style conditions pretty quickly I would think. Suddenly there would be huge criminal money to be made selling something that was previously legal. Sounds like a really dumb idea.
I completely agree.

Still... cigarettes being completely illegal is probably the only way I'll ever quit.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Tyyr »

I dunno, I have trouble imagining a significant underground cigarette black markets popping up. Especially since tobacco plants have one use and one use only. It's not like a farmer running a still on the side where his crop is perfectly legit and his still can be hidden in a barn. To produce tobacco in the quantity necessary to sell them at a decent price is going to be conspicuous. I think a lot of people when faced with the prospect of $5 a pop cigarettes will just choose to quit.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Mikey »

Tyyr wrote:I dunno, I have trouble imagining a significant underground cigarette black markets popping up. Especially since tobacco plants have one use and one use only. It's not like a farmer running a still on the side where his crop is perfectly legit and his still can be hidden in a barn. To produce tobacco in the quantity necessary to sell them at a decent price is going to be conspicuous. I think a lot of people when faced with the prospect of $5 a pop cigarettes will just choose to quit.
Yeah, because growing cannabis sativa is illegal, and that's pretty much put a stop to illegal weed sales, right?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6321
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by McAvoy »

Giuseppe wrote:
BigJKU316 wrote:Iceland might be able to get away with it, as isolated as they are.

The rest of the world would be facing prohibition in the US during the 20's style conditions pretty quickly I would think. Suddenly there would be huge criminal money to be made selling something that was previously legal. Sounds like a really dumb idea.
I completely agree.

Still... cigarettes being completely illegal is probably the only way I'll ever quit.

I agree as well. If I lived back in NJ where my family is where a pack costs nearly $8 or more I'd probably quit too. Though I could always go across the river to Pennsylvania.

Prescription cigarettes is an oxymoron IMO.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Tyyr »

Mikey wrote:Yeah, because growing cannabis sativa is illegal, and that's pretty much put a stop to illegal weed sales, right?
Yeah because aside from rolling papers those two are dead ringers for one another.

1) The buzz you get from THC isn't comparable to anything you get from tobacco aside from the craving mollification.
2) The number of cigarette smokers in the US dwarfs the number of pot smokers in shear number and volume. It's far easier to keep a pot smoker supplied who only lights up a single joint two or three times a week than a cigarette smoker who goes through a pack a day. And THC isn't physically addictive like nicotine is so a pot smoker is far easier looking at their empty wallet and abstaining for a day or two than a cigarette smoker is. Simply put tobacco isn't something that's going to be able to be hidden in grow houses like pot, not and supply the shear volume it would take to keep smokers happy. Ergo the price is going to be very high. When you go from $5 a pack to $5 a cigarette it's going to force a lot of people out of the habit.

I'm not suggesting that it will disappear but alcohol and cigarettes are two different things and the effect of outlawing one isn't necessarily going to be the same as outlawing the other.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by BigJKU316 »

The problem would be uniformity. If smokes were illegal everywhere and they outlawed tobacco everywhere then yes, supplying the market would be impossible and a niche product like pot.

I was thinking more along the lines of the US trying this while Canada and Mexico did not. That would produce a train wreck. If the product/plant were widely accessible to distributors then it would create a huge market it illegal imports and sale kind of like having booze on both borders did during prohibition.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Mikey »

Tyyr wrote:
Mikey wrote:Yeah, because growing cannabis sativa is illegal, and that's pretty much put a stop to illegal weed sales, right?
Yeah because aside from rolling papers those two are dead ringers for one another.

1) The buzz you get from THC isn't comparable to anything you get from tobacco aside from the craving mollification.
2) The number of cigarette smokers in the US dwarfs the number of pot smokers in shear number and volume. It's far easier to keep a pot smoker supplied who only lights up a single joint two or three times a week than a cigarette smoker who goes through a pack a day. And THC isn't physically addictive like nicotine is so a pot smoker is far easier looking at their empty wallet and abstaining for a day or two than a cigarette smoker is. Simply put tobacco isn't something that's going to be able to be hidden in grow houses like pot, not and supply the shear volume it would take to keep smokers happy. Ergo the price is going to be very high. When you go from $5 a pack to $5 a cigarette it's going to force a lot of people out of the habit.

I'm not suggesting that it will disappear but alcohol and cigarettes are two different things and the effect of outlawing one isn't necessarily going to be the same as outlawing the other.
Neither of your two talking points speak to my comment, tnough. You said - to paraphrase - that illegality will render tobacco farming extinct. Well, I just provided a functional real-world example of illegality patently not driving such farming extinct. The number of tobacco smokers will shrink dramatically, and cigarettes, cigars, and dip will be insanely expensive - but it'll still be there.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Tyyr »

I have trouble imagining a significant underground cigarette black markets popping up
Your paraphrase isn't a paraphrase. You ignored a key word in the opening and then tried to run what I said out to the extreme end of what it could have possibly meant.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Mikey »

I didn't ignore it - I imagine a black tobacco market would be considerably more significant than the MJ black market. I just used that as a parallel analogy for the mechanism, not the degree.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6321
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by McAvoy »

Tyyr wrote:
Mikey wrote:Yeah, because growing cannabis sativa is illegal, and that's pretty much put a stop to illegal weed sales, right?
Yeah because aside from rolling papers those two are dead ringers for one another.

1) The buzz you get from THC isn't comparable to anything you get from tobacco aside from the craving mollification.
2) The number of cigarette smokers in the US dwarfs the number of pot smokers in shear number and volume. It's far easier to keep a pot smoker supplied who only lights up a single joint two or three times a week than a cigarette smoker who goes through a pack a day. And THC isn't physically addictive like nicotine is so a pot smoker is far easier looking at their empty wallet and abstaining for a day or two than a cigarette smoker is. Simply put tobacco isn't something that's going to be able to be hidden in grow houses like pot, not and supply the shear volume it would take to keep smokers happy. Ergo the price is going to be very high. When you go from $5 a pack to $5 a cigarette it's going to force a lot of people out of the habit.

I'm not suggesting that it will disappear but alcohol and cigarettes are two different things and the effect of outlawing one isn't necessarily going to be the same as outlawing the other.
I honestly think that is probably the best way of getting cigarettes out of the public's hands. Jack up the price so much that a single cigarette would be like a 'reward' like a really good bottle of wine/beer/food. Yeah there will be a black market but it will still cost way too much for someone who smokes a pack a day will never afford.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Lighthawk
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4632
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Missouri, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milkyway Galaxy, Local Group, Universe

Re: Getting cigarettes on a doctor's prescription

Post by Lighthawk »

Okay, first off...
shran wrote:Swedish surgeons now refuse to operate on smokers until they give up, because of the deleterious effect smoking has on the healing process, Gudnason added.
The fuck? Seriously? What kind of fail logic is that? If someone needs an operation, not wants but needs, by what right should a doctor be able to deny that operation based on the patient's life style? I'm all for them strongly advising them to quit, but handing out an ultimatum? That's just twisted.

As for banning smoking...I really could care less myself. I think it's a fairly gross habit and hate the smell, but honestly, how many people take up the habit now without knowing what the side effects will be? If you think its worth it, I'm not going to stop you, smoke away. I will thank you not to do it by me though, or in your car with your kids.
Image
Post Reply