Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Moderator: BigJKU316

stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Mark wrote:Not me. Night is the best time to be busy. :happydevil:
:whack:
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Response sent.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Well, I had to try. :)
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

stitch626 wrote:Well, I had to try. :)
I don't blame you, I truly don't. Though to be honest I think the terms I sent you were pretty good.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Of course, but if I didn't try my best to make the terms even better, I'd fail even more as a ruler.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

I don't think you've failed. You've done pretty damn well all things considered. You've faced off against three of my fleets and a pretty tough ground army. Resisted occupation for almost two years and have done well enough to get terms other then Unconditional Surrender.

All in all, not bad.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Have not been around much at night but will be around tomorrow to answer questions if anyone has them before turns are due. Been a busy couple of months with lots of late work nights.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

It happens, no rush really since the peace talks are taking so long.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

FYI, since I am on vacation this next week I will be putting in the troop cost and transport changes for Alpha. This will radically reduce your troop cost for un-deployed troops (ie those on major worlds) while making it more difficult to move large numbers of troops to other locations.
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

I'll be doing the same in Beta
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

Can we work out something to do with old and useless ships in Beta too, aside from just decomissioning, or using them for target practice?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

Mark wrote:Can we work out something to do with old and useless ships in Beta too, aside from just decomissioning, or using them for target practice?
Feel free.....

the problem is that this happened in Alpha when BIG took over the Ferangi, I'm not in that position....the one place I can pay you for old ships, some people might be a bit apprehensive about selling to.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

How about my recycling idea? We could "recover" the same amount of money by scrapping and recycling certain parts of our ships.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tyyr »

I suggested getting back 1/3 of the ship's tonnage in resources. Anything to get something useful out of them at the end of their life time.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

I think we can agree to just add back the ore resources by hand for scrapped ships, that won't take much effort. If everyone wants it that is in.

In exciting dork related spreadsheet developments...

In the process of creating a way to calaculate a fleets base carrying capacity for troops (ie how many troops a given fleet can carry without purpose made transports) I realized I could use that number to generate overall endurance ratings for fleets and solve my long time nemesis, the destroyer heavy (or only) fleet. So starting next turn all your fleets will have a deployment duration.

I am not going to get into the math behind it but basically what it does is say the more bigger ships vs little ships you have the longer ranged that fleet will be. It also has a nice feature which lets us simulate war consumption and cut endurance down during times of conflict when ships would consume more resources.
Locked