Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion
Moderator: BigJKU316
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Someone has to, you can't seem to even read your own quotes anymore. Its like dealing with a baby seafort.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Lets just all relax a touch.
For simplicity sake all IC communication is here or through emails. Period. Unless you work it out with me ahead of time that is it. If it did not happen here it did not happen. I can't say that enough times so please everyone listen this time. The only exception is if you cut a deal with the FKI since I run them and I can just write it down.
For simplicity sake all IC communication is here or through emails. Period. Unless you work it out with me ahead of time that is it. If it did not happen here it did not happen. I can't say that enough times so please everyone listen this time. The only exception is if you cut a deal with the FKI since I run them and I can just write it down.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
So is the IC back up or do we need to wait for a bit?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Everything is corrected at this point. Thanks for everyone being tolerant of the occasional mistake. Still a work in progress on some things. Again, everyone please just try to have fun and roll with the punches on things.Deepcrush wrote:So is the IC back up or do we need to wait for a bit?
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Okay, new response number four is up... and if anyone tries to make me change it, i'm going to kill them!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
News is likely tomorrow...waiting on a few loose ends from some people. Sorry about the delay.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
I'm betting the news for this last turn is a bitch for you!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
BTW, before anyone goes on a holy crusade over lost exploratory ships...
When I say lost to causes unknown that is exactly what I mean. I have not had exploratory ships just dissapear before this turn but am starting that practice going forward. If your ship finds something and then rolls less than a 10 out of 100 you lose the ship.
Just think of it as the cost of doing business.
When I say lost to causes unknown that is exactly what I mean. I have not had exploratory ships just dissapear before this turn but am starting that practice going forward. If your ship finds something and then rolls less than a 10 out of 100 you lose the ship.
Just think of it as the cost of doing business.
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Yay, a way to kill my old ships.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
How may I ask do you set ships to explore?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Assign them to a fleet (preferably the 10th), and designate it for Exploration. That's what I did, anyways.Reliant121 wrote:How may I ask do you set ships to explore?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Seems sensible enough!
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
BigJKU316 wrote:BTW, before anyone goes on a holy crusade over lost exploratory ships...
When I say lost to causes unknown that is exactly what I mean. I have not had exploratory ships just dissapear before this turn but am starting that practice going forward. If your ship finds something and then rolls less than a 10 out of 100 you lose the ship.
Just think of it as the cost of doing business.
Would I be able to have another one of my ships investigate my lost ships dissappearance? And try to figure out what happened?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
Sure, if you knew what happened to the ship. But that would defeat the purpose of the "Lost without a trace" part.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Star Trek Sim discussion
I'll probably lose a few of mine, they are almost 100 years old.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.