Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Moderator: BigJKU316

Locked
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mark wrote:Doing my sheet I had a thought. Galaxy exploration at this point is kind of almost a side thought. I've litterally got my oldest ships engaged in galexy exploration and they've got as much chance of discovering anything as a first line ship.

Is there someway we could enhance this aspect of the game? I mean, involving ship ranges, consumables, or even long range sensors? We could at least pick a direction to explore. Perhaps come up with some sort of mods to discovery as opposed to a 1 in a 100 shot.

Thoughts?
I agree that ships with better sensors should have a better chance of discovering something useful. Endurance should also be a factor.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Reliant121 »

I wasn't even aware we could Galaxy explore.

Finally something for my own vessels to do while the xeno warships handle their own business.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Exploring is always going to be a side issue. There is so much space to cover and only short range sensors can be used to find anything of value. Thats just part of the game mechanics since we started. If you want to cover more ground, design a fast and small and cheap ship to do the job for you.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

Deepcrush wrote:Exploring is always going to be a side issue. There is so much space to cover and only short range sensors can be used to find anything of value. Thats just part of the game mechanics since we started. If you want to cover more ground, design a fast and small and cheap ship to do the job for you.
Or a really, really, really big SOB
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Hey BIG, ignore the old sheet, I gotta make a new one. :x
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Mark wrote:LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
:lol: Yeah... Why'd we do that again? :mrgreen:
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Sonic Glitch wrote:
Mark wrote:LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
:lol: Yeah... Why'd we do that again? :mrgreen:
Cause my ships would prove most effective against the Hur'q... if BIG would let us know if the plasma torps of doom can be used agaonst their practically stationary ships.



Trust me, I'm glad. It wasn't just us though... the Klingons are saved too.

:happydevil:
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

Because without Romulans, people start to try and blame Cardassians. LOL :lol:
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Mark wrote:Because without Romulans, people start to try and blame Cardassians. LOL :lol:
Haha. Very true. :D
stitch626 wrote:
Sonic Glitch wrote:
Mark wrote:LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
:lol: Yeah... Why'd we do that again? :mrgreen:
Cause my ships would prove most effective against the Hur'q... if BIG would let us know if the plasma torps of doom can be used agaonst their practically stationary ships.



Trust me, I'm glad. It wasn't just us though... the Klingons are saved too.

:happydevil:
Hmm... "Plasma Torps of Doom"... I like it!
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

That gave me an idea for an anti Hur'q weapon.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Sonic Glitch wrote:
Mark wrote:LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
:lol: Yeah... Why'd we do that again? :mrgreen:
Because we are nice people and don't like violence.
stitch626 wrote:Trust me, I'm glad. It wasn't just us though... the Klingons are saved too.
Not really, its good for us either way. :happydevil:
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Well I don't want to blow up the Hurq motherships. I want to conquer them!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Deepcrush wrote:
Sonic Glitch wrote:
Mark wrote:LOL, the Romulans have no idea how hard we worked to save them from extermination :mrgreen:
:lol: Yeah... Why'd we do that again? :mrgreen:
Because we are nice people and don't like violence.
Wow.. that sounds like it had to be painful to say! :lol:
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Yeah, I was laughing even while typing it.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Locked