Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Moderator: BigJKU316

Locked
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

I was thinking the same thing. :laughroll:
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

Well considering he helped me make this decision I don't think there is a whole lot he can complain about
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

:laughroll:
Ugh, I should go to bed, its already past 3... oh well nothing to do tomorrow. :mrgreen:
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Your body only needs two hours of sleep a day to function.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Deepcrush wrote:Your body only needs two hours of sleep a day to function.
I thought it was three?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Yeah, but my body is used to 10.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Tsukiyumi wrote:I thought it was three?
Eh, details... minor details...
stitch626 wrote:Yeah, but my body is used to 10.
No time like the present to teach your body otherwise.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Nickswitz »

This is fun, and I have nothing to say, the Sheliak are slightly boring the first turn, eh, I'm sure it will turn around.
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Nickswitz wrote:This is fun, and I have nothing to say, the Sheliak are slightly boring the first turn, eh, I'm sure it will turn around.
Based on their actions in the show you could put together a 20,000 page treaty on the subject for everyone to follow.
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Nickswitz »

I certainly could.... And then throw into random subclauses they will never read and I will have complete control! :happydevil:

Yeah, I know that wouldn't work...

I'll work on something though, I have an idea.
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

An FYI, I have decided on a new means to controlling the Federation council.

It is going to be run like some of the more odd Parliments that you see. Essentially there will be two broad parties that garner some percentage (like 60-70%) of the support. Then there will be a pile of single issue groups out there that the executive has to pick from to form a coalition government.

This should simplify things for both Staplic and myself moving forward.

The Cardassian Union works much the same way, though right now Marks party pretty much has a huge super-majority as there have not really been any splitting issues come up for them.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Oh, and BTW Staplic...your government coalition fell apart :lol:

EDIT: This is not a negative. You needed new elections anyway and I sort of changed how this works on the fly to make it simpler to deal with. Basically you just have to form a new coalition. The IC explaination will be that the broad based parties we saw before sort of blew apart under stress into smaller components.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Well that makes it a good time for some for some political shifting then.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Hey BIG, I'll explain to you the internal political details to you soon over email.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

Doing my sheet I had a thought. Galaxy exploration at this point is kind of almost a side thought. I've litterally got my oldest ships engaged in galexy exploration and they've got as much chance of discovering anything as a first line ship.

Is there someway we could enhance this aspect of the game? I mean, involving ship ranges, consumables, or even long range sensors? We could at least pick a direction to explore. Perhaps come up with some sort of mods to discovery as opposed to a 1 in a 100 shot.

Thoughts?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Locked