Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Moderator: BigJKU316

Locked
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Well, morning, but I got mine in. Paying off debt is hard.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Sonic Glitch »

It'll be in shortly..
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

A couple of add ons to the proposed battle rules I thought to add.

Each ship class will now have a "weapon facing" cell in the new sheet (which you will get today). Basically you need to select if the ship will have a bias towards forward facing weapons or will have all around coverage. If you select forward facing, like Klingon ships are designed, then you will attack at 150% your rated output on tagets directly in front of your group (ie I can go straight along a line of hexes in the direction of your facing to the target). You will attack at 125% on targets 1 hex off that line to either side.

If you select all around weapons for that class then that ship suffers no penalty on flank attacks and only a 25% penalty on attacks from the rear.

This should give the battles more of a distinct feel. Just be warned that if you mix ships of the two types within your fleet they need to stay in seperate battle groups in the battle or you get no bonus at all. Most fleets should have a distinct feel to them. Almost all Federation designs other than the Defiant are all around types. All Klingon ships and Cardassian ships were forward biased ships.

Also, movement will be in the direction of facing only. So to move in a direction you have to face the group in that direction first.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

I had a thought. With the steady marching of time in this game, do we have a system in place that takes into account the hull life of a ship? For example, my Galors are my oldest ships. How long can I run them until they literally fall apart?

Also, are there random losses for those unexplained "problems of the week" that Trek is famous for while exploring?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Nickswitz »

Also... I'm stupid, where do I go for DITL stats?
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Nickswitz wrote:Also... I'm stupid, where do I go for DITL stats?
This ships profile should have them all here.

http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?misdkora

Any custom ships should be in emails somewhere. If not I can look them up for you.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

I emailed mine in... right?

I can't remember, and half of my emails got deleted recently (in short, I'm a moron).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Mark wrote:I had a thought. With the steady marching of time in this game, do we have a system in place that takes into account the hull life of a ship? For example, my Galors are my oldest ships. How long can I run them until they literally fall apart?

Also, are there random losses for those unexplained "problems of the week" that Trek is famous for while exploring?
I am counting on natural attrition to make them useless. Basically the maint. cost becomes so much given the performance that they simply are not worth the trouble anymore. You could in theory keep them around forever though.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

News is up. Not much happened this turn* so turn reports will be short and won't tell you much beyond your sheets. Expect those tonight or tomorrow.

*Except that Staplic got a bad die roll and one of his helmsmen directed his main fleet into a blackhole because he was unable to hit the backup button.... :happydevil:
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

:lol:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

:shock: WHAT!!!!! :madashell:
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Lt. Staplic wrote::shock: WHAT!!!!! :madashell:
It's a joke. In this game your ships almost without exception go where you tell them to go.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

:laughroll:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

Okay. Good. I was about to "roll" seven different crits off of one of seaforts torpedoes. :happydevil:
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Lt. Staplic wrote:Okay. Good. I was about to "roll" seven different crits off of one of seaforts torpedoes. :happydevil:
I will replace you with a changling and have your character in the sim molest a Border Collie on TV. Then we will see how the next election goes.
Locked