Alpha Star Trek Sim discussion

Moderator: BigJKU316

Locked
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Nickswitz »

No changes this turn for me
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Sonic Glitch »

BigJKU316 wrote:I have Federation, Breen and Klingon turns. Please try to get me your sheets today or at least tell me no changes so I can roll the clock ahead.
Give me an hour or so and you'll have it.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

I'm having some problems. Check your email Big
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

I hope ( :worried: ) to have it done before the night is over. I was at school all day, and for once had no access to the internet (or even a computer). And I don't have enough time to do it right now, I'm waiting for my sis to call from the doctors office so I can pick her up.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

Ok, mine is in. Have fun with this one.

That was a nightmare to put back together.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Mark »

Mine's in too finally
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

I am going to have turns late tonight for everyone, spreadsheets at least. Intel might be tomorrow.

I did want to take a vote by those who wish to reply on further refining the fleet battle system. But it would necessitate some data input by players for their ships.

We would need each player to compute and enter the following for each ship class.

Shields + Armor (DITL ratings)
Torpedo Rating (DITL Rating)
Beam Rating (DITL Rating)
Combat Manuverability (DITL Rating)


This would allow the results to be more realistic. But for a few of you this is a massive data entry project (ahem...Staplic's horde of ship classes he collects like pokemon cards).

Let me know if this interest any of you.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Sounds interesting to me; how exactly would these factors be used during combat?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Basically damage ratings would now be computed by figuring your attack vs the opponents defense.

If you are firing torpedoes (there are other modifiers for range I won't disclose here) it would be your torpedo rating against the opponents total shield and armor rating.

Torp Rating and Beam Rating are obvious. They are used at the various ranges to determine your attack (inside of 300,000 it is a combination of both).

Shields plus Armor determines your chances against a given roll.

Combat Manuverability determines basically how many movement points a group of ships has each turn. I will determine an average rating in the battle (whatever it is) then assign each group a movement capability above and below that. So if you have highly manuverable ships they might get to move 7 hexes. Normal ships 5. And lumbering ships would move 3.


That is the long and short of it. Still working out the details but the key for me will be to have standardized data entry on a sheet I can rip data off of and plug into a battle sheet I will have to make so that I can get these setup quickly.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Hey, I'd love to get something like that going. It would allow the smaller powers to have a chance against the bigger powers since we couldn't just send 50000 scouts against them and win outright.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Yeah, I agree with Deep; it would change the battle dynamic pretty effectively. I vote yes.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
BigJKU316
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by BigJKU316 »

Tsukiyumi wrote:Yeah, I agree with Deep; it would change the battle dynamic pretty effectively. I vote yes.
The main reason I did not throw something like this in at the outset is that the initial spreadsheet was enough. I will work on it. No EIS date yet though.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

That's cool, man. Take your time; we're in no real rush. :)

You've got DITL calc stats on all of my ships already anyways.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by Lt. Staplic »

It may take me two weeks, but I'll get 'er done.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Sim discussion

Post by stitch626 »

I'll work on it... shouldn't be too long.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Locked