Federation Battlestar
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Federation Battlestar
A bit out of context though - you should have used Silver Spar or Blue Leader.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Federation Battlestar
Its not even 10 am here yet, and I haven't had coffee yet. Don't pick on me.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:03 am
Re: Federation Battlestar
I think Star Wars indicative are more well known than Galactica indicative
If you want to ask me, this avatar is a resized version of "The War Come Home" by Davemetlesits found on DeviantArt
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Federation Battlestar
Very true. I've never watched a single BSG episode of either series so
Re: Federation Battlestar
I strongly reccomend them little bro. The original is a bit campy, but I still love it. nBSG is much darker and a great show, but I really didn't care for the religious overtones. The space battles were awesome.
I wish they'd do a movie FEATURING the annialation of the fleet......or even more action from the first war.
I wish they'd do a movie FEATURING the annialation of the fleet......or even more action from the first war.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Federation Battlestar
DarkMoineau wrote:Well, a little bigger than Colonial Viper.
I was trying to do that on purpose. We are packing alot more into these birds than they did. A total of three phaser banks, two micro torp launchers, and room for cap ship ordinance. Plus shield generators, armor, thrusters and impusle drive not to mention a warp drive system.
We'd almost HAVE to have a bigger ship.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:03 am
Re: Federation Battlestar
yes indeed.
But, this ship need to enter in the launch tube
But, this ship need to enter in the launch tube
If you want to ask me, this avatar is a resized version of "The War Come Home" by Davemetlesits found on DeviantArt
Re: Federation Battlestar
It's all proportionate. Our Battlestar is a lot bigger, so bigger launch tubes shouldn't be a problem.
I'll start work on our "Raptors" if needed, but wouldn't SF Shuttles and Runabouts fill that role perfectly anyway?
I'll start work on our "Raptors" if needed, but wouldn't SF Shuttles and Runabouts fill that role perfectly anyway?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:03 am
Re: Federation Battlestar
I think a more shielded and armed Scout can fit.
If you want to ask me, this avatar is a resized version of "The War Come Home" by Davemetlesits found on DeviantArt
Re: Federation Battlestar
Hmm....I can manage that.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Federation Battlestar
Raptor class Multirole Interstellar craft (Scout, Mobile Base, Heavy Bomber, Rescue Ship)
Length 23.1m
Beam 14m
Height 6m
Decks 1
Crew 2 - 6 (depending on mission op, max evacuation limit 40)
Armament:
6 Type IV phaser arrays
Total output 1000 Terrawatts
2 Mirco photon torpedo launchers with 24 rounds each
Underbelly mountings for heavy anti-starship ordinance
Defense:
Regenerative Shield System
Total Capacity 75,000 TeraJoules
Light Duranium/Tritanium Hull
Low Level SIF
Warp Speed
Normal Cruise: Warp 9.5
Maximum Cruise: Warp 9.9
Emergency Speed: Warp 9.95 for twelve hours
Length 23.1m
Beam 14m
Height 6m
Decks 1
Crew 2 - 6 (depending on mission op, max evacuation limit 40)
Armament:
6 Type IV phaser arrays
Total output 1000 Terrawatts
2 Mirco photon torpedo launchers with 24 rounds each
Underbelly mountings for heavy anti-starship ordinance
Defense:
Regenerative Shield System
Total Capacity 75,000 TeraJoules
Light Duranium/Tritanium Hull
Low Level SIF
Warp Speed
Normal Cruise: Warp 9.5
Maximum Cruise: Warp 9.9
Emergency Speed: Warp 9.95 for twelve hours
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:03 am
Re: Federation Battlestar
Well, good spec, but the shield is weaker than the Viper shied?
If you want to ask me, this avatar is a resized version of "The War Come Home" by Davemetlesits found on DeviantArt
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Federation Battlestar
I would give the Raptor the same shield system as the Viper. Makes service and repair easier.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Federation Battlestar
Have you seen The Plan? That focuses more on the destruction of the Twelve Colonies.Mark wrote:I strongly reccomend them little bro. The original is a bit campy, but I still love it. nBSG is much darker and a great show, but I really didn't care for the religious overtones. The space battles were awesome.
I wish they'd do a movie FEATURING the annialation of the fleet......or even more action from the first war.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Federation Battlestar
By all rights fire control should be so heavily automated that the ship nearly fights itself with the battle staff simply prioritizing the targets as needed. The AEGIS system was doing this in the 1970's with computing power that is less than a high end laptop you can buy today so really it should not be that hard. Hell, the USN put a couple of pretty neat systems out there in WWII that used mechanical computers and optics that basically let one main train and fire all of the guns (except light AA) on a ship and it made sure they did not fire in such a way as to damage the ship itself.Captain Seafort wrote:I'd go further than that and abandon the dependency on centralised fire control altogether. It's certainly useful, and should be used as the primary means of fire control due to the importance of coordinated action (i.e. avoiding one ship being hit by half a dozen shots and another being ignored), but each turret should also have a local control station in case damage knocks out the centralised control or there are too many targets to deal with. In the latter case, split the sky into sections and have each turret worry about their section of it (with overlaps to avoid anything slipping through the cracks).Mark wrote:I think the key point is gunners (plural) SF has this annoying habit of having one officer trying to fire all the ship/stations weapons all at once. I actually think that a team of six gunners with the tactical officer overseeing them would be more effective considering the sheer amount of firepower we are fielding.
There should be individual backups for sure, but your central fire control system, given the technology avaliable to them, should be able to effectively handle spiltting the sky and de-conflicting targeting without having to resort to any local control.
So I guess my point is that having one person designate targets should be well within the ability of ships of that time. Why they are so bad at doing it and so slow to respond is beyond me but technically there is no real reason they could not do far better.
A ship this big with this many weapons should be able to do all sorts of neat things to help it kick ass. I just don't think most trek writers are terribly grounded in modern military technology.