Its not a bad show. I wasn't to happy with the outcome of the Gladiator v Apache. The scores for the Gladiator weren't just low but pathetic. Can't help but honestly believe they messed up the numbers some how. Didn't help that the Gladiator guys didn't bring in good armor and they took a sling vs a bow.Mark wrote:Anybody else watch "The Deadliest Warrior"? I caught another rerun last night, where they matched up the Apache warrior vs a Gladiator. Some of those damned Gladiator weapons were badass. The Scissor for one. The Trident and net combo worked better that I would have expected as well.
The Samurai had one problem and that was getting past the Viking's shield. Even after that, the scores were very close. It was a surprisingly even fight. With only a slight bit of luck, it could have gone the other way.Mark wrote:What I found interesting is that the Samuri won his challange, yet the Knights lost theirs.
The Knight was a whole new problem. They had to get close, up close the Pirate didn't have a chance. The close combat scores for the Pirate was a joke. The Knight also would have had better luck if they had remembered to add their shield to the mix as their counter to the blunderbuss. Only 1/3 of the shot of the weapon made it through the armor. A shield would have removed this problem and given the Knight a much better chance.