You've only just put moral into it.Deepcrush wrote:Backpeddal what? I wonder if we are even talking about the same thing. Why is it that you two keep removing MORAL from what I am saying? Do you truly like to cry over something that much? Its like talking to a woman during PMS. The whole selective hearing and what not.
You wrote, and still maintain, that the definition of murder is 'a meaningless killing'. Killing for money is not meaningless, so under your definition, it's not murder. If you can't comprehend something so utterly simple as that then you, in all seriousness, need to get back to school.
Your attempt at backpeddaling is by putting 'moral' into the meaning part. Meaningless or meaningful isn't only good things. But now you've just wrote moral in there, you've attempted to make it mean only good. So if something has meaning, then it has a purpose - whether that purpose is good or bad. If something has moral meaning, then it has only a good purpose. You've tried, unsuccesfully, to change what your point is and it really is showing that you know you're wrong but refuse to concede.