Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Yes, by science ship I mean similar (in role) to the oberth etc.
Bite my shiny metal ass
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
So what? It's a science ship, not a cruiser or a battleship. It's not meant to fight, so it's unsurprising that it would be destroyed by a weapon that could seriously shake up Starfleet's top-of-the-line battleship.Sonic Glitch wrote:I mean the Oberth was taken out in what, 1 shot from a BOP?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
You're right, it's not meant to fight. But it'd be nice if it could survive long enough for help to get there. I'm not saying we make every ship a galaxy-class equivalent when it comes to weapons but it'd be nice if they could last. As someone commented in the novel Star Trek: Best Destiny they "aren't the cavalry or even the covered wagons. They're the choo-choo trains meant to go in after everything is declared safe." However, apparently Klingon ships have a way of turning up in the middle of Federation space to take potshots, so I don't think we should necessarily increase their offensive capabilities but enhance their defensive capabilities and/or warp drive so they can survive long enough to signal for help then Run Like Hell.Captain Seafort wrote:So what? It's a science ship, not a cruiser or a battleship. It's not meant to fight, so it's unsurprising that it would be destroyed by a weapon that could seriously shake up Starfleet's top-of-the-line battleship.Sonic Glitch wrote:I mean the Oberth was taken out in what, 1 shot from a BOP?
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Again, I don't see why. Equipping science vessels against the possibility of Klingons turning up in Federation space is the equivalent of issuing scientists in Yosemite with body armour in case a bunch of trigger-happy Spetsnaz show up.Sonic Glitch wrote:However, apparently Klingon ships have a way of turning up in the middle of Federation space to take potshots, so I don't think we should necessarily increase their offensive capabilities but enhance their defensive capabilities and/or warp drive so they can survive long enough to signal for help then Run Like Hell.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
So they shouldn't be able to run like hell and we should just write them off in the event something unfortunate happens? (Which seems to be ever 3rd episode on average)Captain Seafort wrote:Again, I don't see why. Equipping science vessels against the possibility of Klingons turning up in Federation space is the equivalent of issuing scientists in Yosemite with body armour in case a bunch of trigger-happy Spetsnaz show up.Sonic Glitch wrote:However, apparently Klingon ships have a way of turning up in the middle of Federation space to take potshots, so I don't think we should necessarily increase their offensive capabilities but enhance their defensive capabilities and/or warp drive so they can survive long enough to signal for help then Run Like Hell.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
I say troop transport. S/E is already covered to an insane point with the UFP. As for medical, the troop transport could always double as such. One carries troops, the other carries doctors. Simple enough call there.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Would said scientists be able to run like hell? The solution is to make sure that the Klingons don't get into Fed space in the first place, and to respond firmly in the case of such incidents (either economically or militarily).Sonic Glitch wrote:So they shouldn't be able to run like hell and we should just write them off in the event something unfortunate happens? (Which seems to be ever 3rd episode on average)
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
If you're in unprotected space, send an Intrepid. If you're outside of UFP space then send a GCS. If you're looking at funny star stuff with cadets, pack them in an Orbeth or Nova and don't waste the resources that could be used else where.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
I do agree with you there, but that doesn't seem to happen in Trek. This is the Federation we're talking about and while since the DW they've become less hippie-like, that doesn't mean there aren't enough hippies still in power for their to be a resurgence.Captain Seafort wrote: The solution is to make sure that the Klingons don't get into Fed space in the first place, and to respond firmly in the case of such incidents (either economically or militarily).
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
While the two roles would certainly require similar ships, I don't think they could double up. The main requirements for a troop transport would be large open storage areas for vehicles and barracks for the troops. A medical ship would require wards, operating theatres, and much wider corridors than your typical starship. You'd probably be able to use the same basic hull, as speed and the ability to load and unload large numbers of people quickly would be required by both, but the internal arrangements mean that they'd be two separate classes.Deepcrush wrote:I say troop transport. S/E is already covered to an insane point with the UFP. As for medical, the troop transport could always double as such. One carries troops, the other carries doctors. Simple enough call there.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
They are however close enough together that you could make one base outer hull design. Then work in subsections to allow the same ship to do two things. I agree with you on most, so I'll only point out the part in which I don't.
Is there any reason that the corridors on a transport/troop ship would have to be any different then that of a transport/medical ship? I don't think so. In fact, for your troop ships you'd want a lot of shoulder room as to ready your troops for deployment or recall as rapidly as possible.and much wider corridors than your typical starship.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
You might want a bit of extra room (I'm not sure how wide the corridors are on a modern LPD compared to other warships), but even fully-equipped troops don't need as much room as mobile beds, which a hospital's corridors need to accommodate.Deepcrush wrote:Is there any reason that the corridors on a transport/troop ship would have to be any different then that of a transport/medical ship? I don't think so. In fact, for your troop ships you'd want a lot of shoulder room as to ready your troops for deployment or recall as rapidly as possible.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Unless you plan on moving troops in single file, you're going to want a wide space. My shoulders (i'm about average build) are just under two feet in width. Double file each way means a corridor of eight feet in width. Which would also allow a mobile bed with medical to pass side by side without having to worry about hitting each other.Captain Seafort wrote:You might want a bit of extra room (I'm not sure how wide the corridors are on a modern LPD compared to other warships), but even fully-equipped troops don't need as much room as mobile beds, which a hospital's corridors need to accommodate.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13108
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
I voted for medical. Might be intriguing. Have we devoted our brainpower to such a field?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Designing a New Daystrom Ship.
Sonic was right... initially. I did mean a dedicated science ship, in nature like the Oberth or Nova. However, byt "more capability" I didn't mean military capability. Like Seafort, I have no issue with science ships being comparatively unarmed compared to warships or explorers(which are by nature intended to "beat the bounds.") By greater capability I meant rather that it would be nice to see a dedicated science/research ship with the stamina to stay on-site at a point of interest, or with the range and top end to get to one that's farther than the next system over. If we're talking about a phenomenon or POI in unexplored, disputed, or dangerous territory, then by all means the answer is to send an explorer or a science ship under escort - not upgun a research vessel.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer